DAVID FERRIE: MAFIA PILOT --the KEY to the Kennedy Assassination

DAVID FERRIE: MAFIA PILOT PAPERBACK, AUTOGRAPHED

BUY ME & LEE from the author, autographed!

Order your AUTOGRAPHED ME & LEE here!
BUY ME & LEE IN MANY WAYS!
Shipping Included.MANY THANKS!

Help out! Keep Me in the Fight! THANK YOU FOR YOUR DONATION!

Sunday, November 28, 2010

ME & LEE AND OCTOBER 18: LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S BIRTHDAY: A READER'S RESPONSE

THE RESPONSE FROM A READER [BELOW] TO THE BOOK ME & LEE: HOW I CAME TO KNOW, LOVE AND LOSE LEE HARVEY OSWALD, TELLS HOW HE SENSES THE GROWING IMPORTANCE OF OCTOBER 18 IN AMERICAN HISTORY. LEE HARVEY OSWALD, AN AMERICAN HERO, WAS UNJUSTLY ACCUSED OF KILLING THE PRESIDENT.

IRONICALLY, LEE GAVE HIS LIFE TRYING TO SAVE THE PRESIDENT, AND RECENTLY WE HAVE COME TO REALIZE THAT LEE OSWALD ACTUALLY EXTENDED JFK'S LIFE AN ADDITIONAL 3 WEEKS. LEE H. OSWALD WAS BORN OCT. 18, 1939.

LEE WORE HIS MARINE RING TO THE VERY END. THIS RING WAS REMOVED FROM HIS HAND AND PHOTOGRAPHED, BUT NEVER LISTED IN THE OFFICIAL LIST OF LEE'S POSSESSIONS: THAT WOULD HAVE LOOKED SUSPICIOUS--RIGHT?



HE WOULD LIVE JUST 24 SHORT YEARS, SERVING HIS COUNTRY FOR 1/3 OF HIS ENTIRE LIFE, AND ALL OF HIS ADULTHOOD, BEFORE BEING KILLED BY HIS OWN FRIEND, JACK RUBY, WHO SAID:



PEOPLE ARE BEGINNING TO REALIZE JUST WHAT LEE HARVEY OSWALD 'WAS ABOUT' --THE VERY WORDS LEE TOLD ME HE GAVE TO HIS UNCLE DUTZ, WHO THEN ASSURED LEE THAT HE HAD KNOWN WHAT LEE 'WAS ABOUT' BECAUSE CARLOS MARCELLO, THE GODFATHER OF NEW ORLEANS AND A GOOD FRIEND OF DUTZ', HAD TOLD LEE'S UNCLE THAT LEE WAS WORKING FOR THE CIA IN A COOPERATIVE EFFORT TO KILL FIDEL CASTRO. THE CIA FORMALLY ADMITTED THIS PARTNERSHIP WITH THE MAFIA ONLY A FEW YEARS AGO.

HERE IS THE EMAIL ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF OCTOBER 18, AS WRITTEN BY A READER OF ME & LEE:

I started reading your book as soon as it arrived. Weeks after finishing it, I am still without words.
* * *
In some way, I seem to inhabit so many of the scenes of this tragedy.
* * *
If you prayed for the book to produce an effect beyond the usual domain of crafted words, then as far as I am concerned your prayer was answered abundantly, powerfully.
* * *
I hope that you were, or will be, able to see ex-Gov. Ventura's Conspiracy Theory TV program (on TruTV). The most recent one (11/19 here) was devoted to JFK (and actually aired, while the usual 11/22 propagandists remained strangely silent, no doubt concocting their worst efforts for the 50th anniversary).
The Governor certainly performed a much-needed service for our country, for every person who is contending with the cognitive and spiritual warpage which overspreads our age. Somehow, Ventura elicited an admission of "lone gunman doubt" from none other than Gary Mack, and then reduced Vincent Bugliosi to incoherency, by refusing to be browbeaten by that eminent jurist's usual tactics of intimidation (verbal goosestepping, the anti-rational marshalling of long-disproven 'facts' reanimated by the brute force of ego).
Even further, the Governor (in a memorable jeremiad of a summation) declared outright that LHO was indeed a patsy, and innocent, having played no criminal part in the hideous events of that day.
* * *
This year, I found myself observing 10/18 (more each year, for the past several years). Any more, there is no 11/22 without 10/18.
* * *
You must have poured your entire life, your entire self (and Lee's) into this book. How it intensifies the "will not leave one alone" quality of those times, places, and events.
To call Me & Lee a tidal wave is sickeningly inadequate.
May this towering wall of truth sweep away the generations of lies from our history, and recreate a living landscape fit for America and Americans (worthy of the name) once more.
Above all, thank you on behalf of our stricken nation for undergoing the Unspeakable that it must have taken to bring into being this unparalleled record of youthful love, scientific zeal, idealism, and patriotism--all inextinguishable, and which will, surely, shine brightly forever.
--Stephen Z.

Saturday, October 16, 2010

THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION, LEE HARVEY OSWALD, AND MY RECORD OF HIS WORDS

ME & LEE: HOW I CAME TO KNOW, LOVE AND LOSE LEE HARVEY OSWALD --AND WHY I DID NOT FORGET HIS WORDS
BY JUDYTH VARY BAKER

I am being asked how I’ve been able to remember conversations that occurred decades earlier. At one time, I was able to read a page and recite every word on the page, but since having sustained several concussions a decade ago, I’ve lost that ability. However, I still retain an excellent memory for details, as anyone knows who converses with me. Recently, however, I have been asked how I could possibly have remembered, in full detail, the conversations as presented in the book Me & Lee: How I Came to Know, Love and Lose Lee Harvey Oswald. (see http://www.judythvarybaker.com for more information).
Indeed, when I first presented our conversations in book form, in late 1999, I was afraid to place them in quotes for fear I wouldn’t be believed. “How could she remember so many details?” could have seemed a quite reasonable question, unless one had met me and knew how entirely precise I could be concerning details on almost any subject. I have been blessed (or cursed) with the ability to remember almost everything I’ve ever read. My brain is actually overloaded with information.
Nevertheless, most of the conversations in the book Deadly Alliance, -- the first largely accurate book about “Me and Lee” -- written with the help of researcher Howard Platzman -- were recorded in “he said,” and ”she said” mode.
That book did not convey enough information, based as it was on emails passed back and forth, though it was a vast improvement over the ‘teaser book’ shown to publishers a year earlier, which contained very little information. The teaser book was a means to see what publishers might be interested in what I had to say without revealing key matters that I held back until I could determine which publisher(s) could be trusted.
Unfortunately, at the time I had a literary agent who tried to force the CBS news magazine Sixty Minutes to take “his” producer --- Isidore Rosmarin--- who had produced some stories for Sixty Minutes in the past --to film my story.

But Sixty Minutes wanted to use a different producer. When the agent refused to cooperate on this and other matters, I fired him.
There would be no more meetings with publishers, after that bad experience with an agent, for a decade. Even my association with the seasoned researcher, Harrison E. Livingstone, who went on to publish an unauthorized version of my book, was wholly through emails. But Livingstone wanted the book to be published quickly. Consequently, he did not allow me to check it for errors. It had far too many, and I stopped its publication.

Disappointed with Livingstone’s incomplete editing job, I returned to my original plan – not to have the information published until after my death. I would just go on with my life—if possible. But I was being harassed and threatened. And Internet newsgroups had set out to destroy my reputation. I defended myself, which simply gave them material to alter, or to shamelessly quote in bits and pieces out of context. When I corrected false statements that they attributed to me, they said I had changed my story. They even published so-called contradictions that they, themselves had created. In addition, false stories were circulated, such as that I had changed my name to “Vary” from “Avary” because I was ashamed of my family’s name – a story even mentioned by the respected researcher, Jack White, who believed it was true.

======Jack White, on Apr 11 2010, 01:25 AM, said to Dr. James Fetzer:====
"JVB has claimed that she "hated" her family name of AVARY (Judy Ann Avary), so she changed her name to Judyth A. VARY. I consider this a peculiar thing for a teen girl to do. And then go off all alone to a distant strange city. Sounds like a bad familial relationship. A runaway? Jack"=================

The truth: my maiden name was "Judyth Anne Vary." I never 'hated' my family name, and my family name was never "Avary." I used "Avary" as a FIRST name when teaching at the University of Louisiana for six years, so that the name "Judyth" would not be used -- I was afraid of being linked to 1963 too easily. Many equally silly stories have been passed around, along with unfounded accusations and speculations.
Apparently “anything goes” in newsgroups, but I mention the problem here because other "quotations" are rampant in the newsgroups that are equally absurd and unfounded.

Most newsgroups have been infiltrated by persons who deliberately create dissent, parroting old government-sponsored lies about Oswald that have long been disproven, but which the government continues to disseminate.
I call such defenders of that obsolete stance traitors to their country. They believe that for the security of the country, these intelligent and clever liars have decided that we should not know who killed Kennedy (the government, through the Mafia, supported by the far right and a military-industrial complex coalition that developed eternal warfare with our neighbors, greedily promoting the financial and moral rape of America’s middle class). I am proud of the scars I carry due to these traitors.
I had decided to go to the grave, originally, with what I knew, and to simply let my son publish the book posthumously. Then I would not have to battle the forces that could (and did) ruin my life. However, two factors came into play to change my mind about going to the grave before this vital information about Oswald was released to the public: 1) my son was unaware of the milieu in New Orleans, and in the nation, in 1963, and, worse, knew almost nothing about the lies and falsehoods circulating about Oswald. He would be unable to defend the book. 2) I realized that he would not understand the value of the materials I had saved from the past, and how they helped me achieve the feat of remembering the conversations.
A streetcar ticket dated April 28, for example, would have little meaning for my son, whereas for me, it evoked a host of sharp, strong memories, including key conversations. The streetcar ticket shown on p. 145 in the first printing, first edition of Me & Lee, represented the second time I had ridden the St. Charles streetcar in New Orleans. I had failed to save the first ticket, but I saved the second one.
Ihis streetcar ticket and the announcement of the opening of Pontchartrain Beach were saved together…just one example of how I made sure I kept a good chronology of events. Even the time of the streetcar ride is indicated on the ticket.

Each time I looked at that ticket, over the years, a surge of memories of that pivotal day broke over my thoughts in a cascading stream of events. I could remember almost every moment, the most important of which was Lee’s confession that he had beaten his wife. That confession impelled me to decide to go ahead and marry Robert A, Baker, III.
I kept hundreds of such items, and with the help of a diary ---until it was stolen and burned in my very front yard – an event for which I have witnesses --- I was able to keep my memories quite fresh.
Once a year, around Thanksgiving, I would go through several boxes of ‘old things’ – a habit that also produced stacks of Christmas ornaments and other items to begin Christmas decorating. I would dedicate a whole day to what I believed was my duty: not to forget. After my 1986 divorce, I was able to spend far more time going over the conversations and events, without fear of being discovered. My goal was to one day tell Oswald’s beloved daughters just exactly who their father was, but I was also anxious that they would understand exactly why and how their father had come to have a love affair with another woman while still married to their mother.
Their father was entirely innocent of the grave charges against him—the killing of the President, and of a Dallas police officer—and I was determined that Lee Oswald’s sacrifices for his country would not be forgotten. I realized that not only Oswald’s daughters, but also the whole world, would have no way to hear their father’s voice if I did not preserve his words in my memory.
After the assassination of President Kennedy, Lee’s wife, Marina, had been under tremendous pressures. She could have been deported, and her American-born baby left behind, for example, so of course I forgive her for her quailing in the face of threats, as I hope she will forgive me for my existence as “the other woman.” I understand her fears: I was told to keep my mouth shut if I wanted to stay alive, and I did so for decades. Marina was unable to hide. She was in the spotlight.
Life Magazine's Allan Grant photographed Marina Oswald afer the assassination, and the words used to describe that assignment ring with cruel prejudice, with Lee Oswald automatically described by the well-controlled media as Kennedy's killer --which is still the case today:
"Afer (sic) the assassination of JFK was reported, Grant was sent to Dallas, where he photographed Lee Harvey Oswald's wife, Marina (bottom). Working with Life correspondent Tommy Thompson, they tracked down the family of Lee Harvey Oswald and got the exclusive for the magazine,” writes Marden. Richard Stolley, Life’s Los Angeles bureau chief at the time, remembers the coverage. “His kindness toward that notorious family enabled him to win their confidence. After all, it wasn’t their fault that they had a presidential assassin as son and husband, and Allan instinctively understood that.”
(http://stateoftheart.popphoto.com/blog/2008/02/grant-rememberi.html)

It was no secret that Oswald’s marriage was miserable. It improved when the couple lived in New Orleans, for Lee had promised me that he would never strike his wife again, and he kept his promise, knowing that I would have nothing more to do with him if he broke it. As Lee Oswald learned to control his anger – his wife could say very cruel things, and could be very provocative – I saw him mature before my eyes into the man he yearned to be –more gentle, sensitive, and kind. Lee Oswald was always kind to animals and children, but I reminded him that Hitler had dogs he loved, and was quite kind to children. They were no threat to his manhood. It was Lee’s challenge, I insisted, to become the kind of man I knew he really could become.
Witnesses who defended Lee Harvey Oswald were ignored – and some died under suspicious circumstances, or were actually murdered. Then, for decades, the public was given a grossly distorted picture of the accused assassin, based on a mass of poorly handled and sometimes faked evidence. But it was Lee Harvey Oswald who intervened to save Kennedy’s life – at the risk of his own—in Chicago. It was Lee Harvey Oswald who joined an ’abort team’ that was organized to try to save Kennedy in Dallas.
Thus Oswald had to be eliminated, even before the eyes of millions, before he could tell reporters and others who was responsible for the President’s death.

Lee Harvey Oswald was shot to death by someone who had been a friend of his for years – the Dallas Mafia bagman and police fixer Jack Ruby, who ran a local nightclub. Ruby later told reporters that “a new kind of government” was taking over the country. The reason he had to kill Oswald would never become known, he said, because those in “high places” would make sure of that.

I had been forced into silence to save my life. But I finally realized that if I did not speak out during my lifetime, I would have no way of defending the book, Oswald’s words, or the researchers and witnesses who already given so much to get the truth to the people. By speaking out, my career – to be a respected professor of English -- was destroyed. I was also heckled, harassed, threatened, and harmed, to the extent that I had to leave the country twice, and finally, in 2007, permanently, becoming the first American non-combatant woman to seek political asylum in the EU system.
There I was sheltered for over ten and a half months –as long as the system could legally keep me (for the US is not on the list of countries from which asylum seekers could be accepted), until my family and friends found ways for me to live in safe places overseas, far from my enemies. To this day I rely on donations to pay for the medical problems I still have from the so-called “accidents” I suffered while living in Dallas, where I had moved in order to try to find more witnesses to help me defend Oswald.
I wish to make it clear that the conversations that Lee Oswald and I shared were memorized and kept fresh in my memories over time because they were not the ordinary kind of conversations that a man and a woman share, who are in love. They were conversation kept intact in my memory because they were conversations involving the planned murder of Cuba’s communist leader, Fidel Castro, the clandestine development of formidable bioweapons, and the knowledge that Lee Oswald confided to me that he had penetrated an assassination ring intent on killing Kennedy. Would YOU forget such conversations?
Lee told me, too, that he was “better off dead to both sides” –the Communists and the CIA – because neither side could trust him. This was the man accused of killing President John F. Kennedy. It was my solemn responsibility, therefore, to retain the memory of what Oswald said. I do not pretend to have recalled every word he spoke, but I can guarantee that everything written in these conversations represent the true mind of Oswald as he confided his thoughts and concerns to me. Over the years, if I recalled something that I had missed, I would enter it under the proper day, and even the hour.
Mary Ferrell, upon seeing my personal chronology, gave me a personal copy of her own. Her gift allowed me to find the information I badly needed concerning Fernando Fernandez, a pro-Castro spy about whom I could previously find nothing . Finding his name in the Ferrell chronology was a relief, for it allowed me to see that I had correctly recalled everything about him.
I was surprised, however, to find a number of errors in Ferrell’s chronology, which I have pointed out to researchers. Most of these “errors” are traceable to misinformation deliberately generated to falsely implicate Oswald. The prejudice in Ferrell’s chronology is obvious in such statements as “Oswald shot at General Walker,” and her entirely unreasonable living allowance for him and his family, which fails, for example, to take into account transportation and medical expenses. I have my own record of expenses for my life in New Orleans at that time, to the very penny, and I could not have lived on the puny allowance Ferrell applies to Oswald, his pregnant wife, and their toddler. Her point seems to be that he was able to finance everything without help from outside sources: this is not true.
When the book Me & Lee was being edited in an attempt to make the story shorter and more accessible to the general public, sometimes a few words would be changed or left out, and I would inform one of the editors involved that such-and-such words had to be retained. Presently, I see only one word in Oswald’s conversation printed in error in the first printing of Me & Lee -- on p. 457 the word “gravitating” is used, when Oswald actually said “grav-tating” --- a “typo” that was “corrected” by the editors without my noticing it.
There are a few other problems that will eventually be corrected that are now present in the 606-page book —a sentence is repeated, a photo of witness Mac McCullough is missing, and a photo of Charles Thomas, AKA Arthur Young, is mislabeled, with its hand-written message truncated. There are also a few typos in the mass of end notes, too, but all-in-all, the editors improved the book immensely. In particular, Edward T. Haslam, the author of Dr. Mary’s Monkey, made important and insightful improvements to the book. His expert knowledge of New Orleans meant that he was also able to obtain information about Mary Richardson, a then-young, socially-active wife of a well-known minister who could have been an important witness in the case. But chillingly, she died of an unexpected and suspicious heart attack only sixteen days after the assassination.
I want everyone to know that every sentence in the book coming from Oswald’s mouth is as close to what he said as memory has permitted. To anyone who wonders how I could have preserved the conversations, please remember: Lee Harvey Oswald was no ordinary man. This man was accused of killing Kennedy. These were historic conversations. If you had been in the position I was – in love with this innocent man – a man accused of killing Kennedy-- I believe that you, too, would have made an extra effort never to forget.

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

WHY YOU SHOULD NOT TRUST WIKIPEDIA BIOGRAPHIES

Do you trust Wikipedia's biographies?

Better think twice.

THIS NOVEMBER, AN ESTIMATED 100,000 PEOPLE WILL READ LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S BIOGRAPHY ONLINE. ALMOST ALL OF THEM WILL ACCESS WIKIPEDIA'S BIOGRAPHY.
THEY WILL NOT GET THE TRUTH.


I KNOW.

DO NOT TRUST WIKIPEDIA. WHY? 'EDITORS' -- WHOSE IDENTITY AND CREDENTIALS ARE KNOWN ONLY AS FAR AS THEY DEIGN TO DISCLOSE THEM ON THE INTERNET -- HAVE TAKEN OVER THE BIOGRAPHIES OF FAMOUS AND/OR CONTROVERSIAL FIGURES. IN MANY CASES, THESE 'EDITORS' HAVE ERASED BIOGRRAPHIES THEY DON'T AGREE WITH OR DO NOT LIKE. MY BIOGRAPHY WAS ON WIKIPEDIA FOR ALMOST SIX YEARS WHEN IT WAS ERASED --AFTER I PROTESTED FALSE STATEMENTS AND OUTRIGHT LIES.

THIS BLOG WILL SHOW YOU WHAT WIKIPEDIA AND ITS 'MIRROR' SITES SUCH AS INDOPEDIA DID TO MY BIOGRAPHY. OVER EVERY PROTEST I MADE.

IT IS A LESSON IN REWRITING HISTORY TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF A FEW WHO CONTROL WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO KNOW.


DO YOU TRUST WIKIPEDIA BIOGRAPHIES? AFTER READING THIS ARTICLE, I HOPE NOT. THIS IS A LESSON IN HOW PREJUDICE IS CREATED ON THE INTERNET.

My biography was in Wikipedia for five years. It was far from accurate, but at least there were links to sites that supported my testimony.
but in 2008, when I complained about the inaccuracies, the entire biography was removed, and only a crude variation, replete with most of the same errors, omissions and falsehoods, remained In Wikipedia under “Kennedy Assassination Conspiracy Theories.”
Attempts by my friends were also made to correct the falsehoods. They were erased immediately.

Not only did Wikipedia erase my biography online: since then, over 250,000 Google search references to the name (in quotes) “Judyth Vary Baker” --most of them supporting me -- have vanished, while “mirror” online encyclopedias such as Indopedia continue to repeat the faked biography, with its errors, omissions and falsehoods, as copied from Wikipedia.
I testify that you will not find the truth in Wikipedia and "popular encyclopedia" versions of Lee Harvey Oswald’s biography.
Attempts to even get the Wikipedia biography to state that Oswald received his GED in the Marines were erased, leaving the impression that Oswald never achieved a high school education. There are many more errors, and much of the new evidence exculpating Lee Harvey Oswald, falsely accused as the assassin of John F. Kennedy, never made it into these outdated biographies.

An exception is “Lee Harvey Oswald: a Modern Biography” which is online at SCRIBD. I wrote this biography, taking care to adhere to the truth.

Copies of the updated, truthful biography of Oswald will be posted at Lee-Harvey-Oswald.com as well. Perhaps readers will come away with a better impression of Oswald, which they should.

In order to present the reader with an idea of how many errors, omissions, and falsehoods are in the Lee Harvey Oswald biography, I have placed the bogus biography written about me, Judyth Vary Baker, that was on Wikipedia, and copied elsewhere, in this article for the reader to examine, with remarks where the biographical material is in error.

I have placed such comments in bold face, and some are underlined, in order to compare and contrast the TRUTH with the mangled version currently online for anyone interested in learning more about “Judyth Vary Baker” – for I was Lee Harvey Oswald’s lover in the summer of 1963, and we had planned to leave the US to live together in Mexico. Both of us had unhappy relationships with our spouses at the time.
In my book, Me & Lee: How I Came to Know, Love, and Lose Lee Harvey Oswald, the truth becomes apparent. The biography is quite warped in comparison. he writing sty;e of the biography is also highly unprofessional, written without attention to style or the usual rules applied to biographies involving accuracy, attention to important details, and respect for the person described. That I am still alive, with such a "biography" on the Internet, is indicative of how much liberty can be taken with the truth by those determined to destroy their reputation. My book should not be the only source of the truth!

I will be placing my biography online soon, in an attempt to correct the falsehoods.
However, at this time, I wish to point out how my biography has been mangled by the Internet, despite all efforts to correct the errors.
Note that there are also libelous statements made about me by other so-called reputable sources, such as The History Channel. THC’s online “Conspiracy theories” section says that I “claim” to have created AIDS!
The History Channel never contacted me at my well-known email address to even ask if the charge they placed against me was true. It was not.

You can see the attack against me -- and others -- at this website address:

http://www.history.com/videos/jfk-assassion-conspiracy-theories#jfk-assassion-conspiracy-theories

Note that the History Channel tells you about just ONE of Jim garrison's early theories about why Kennedy was shot, ignoring his later statements about the government's involvement. This is misrepresenting history.
The History Channel still has a now-altered --but still libelous statement-- saying I claim to have worked with a super-secret team that created AIDS. This statement was recently altered from an earlier version where the History Channel said I claimed to have created AIDS. The statement is still libelous, however, and continues to generate many problems for me, including death threats:

The History Channel has also been vilifying John F. Kennedy and his family in an attempt to reduce public outrage when the truth – that we had a Coup d’ etat – that Kennedy was killed with the cooperation of our own government -- finally reaches a majority of the people with enough evidence to provide them with the truth.

That will not happen if current media control continues to change historic facs right before our eyes.

This November, JFK will be assassinated again by the media, as his personal moral shortcomings will be stressed to the young, who never knew how much this great man did for his country.

I find it troubling and disgusting that no true monument has been raised to John F. Kennedy. instead, his reputation is being systematically destroyed by those who got into power through his killers.
And we who are witnesses are being erased from the Internet, and degraded in biographies over which we have no control, these falsehoods are even being repeated by The (Rewriting) History Channel.
Our media is hopelessly enmeshed in parroting the Official Versions they are told to parrot, due to mega-monopolies owning the newspapers and the media outlets. Our legislators are quite compromised financially. They must raise enormous sums to run for office. The Supreme Court has now allowed them to receive unlimited “donations” from big business. Who tells the elected officials of this country what to do? Not the American people.
For the first time, I’m afraid that my country will not only be bled dry by the greedy and the unprincipled who now control her every breath, but that the American people themselves will be entangled in a net of deception where they will be kept ignorant of the truth to the extent that whistleblowers such as myself will be seen as enemies of freedom, justice, and of the state, when we have risked our very lives for the sake of the truth, and for the sake of our country.
For such reasons as the History Channel’s saying I claim to have been involved in the invention of AIDS – a blatant lie-- I have been forced to live in exile and rely on donations for even the most basic essentials, as I’m not allowed to work overseas, and at my age, I would not be hired by anyone, anyway.
No, I never expected to have to live away from home and family, far from my country, because of death threats. I expected some problems, but not the loss of my teaching career, the robbery of all my possessions more than once, and getting physically injured. That falsehoods remain on the internet about me, while many true statements about me have been erased, is a cause of much concern.
I am alive, for God's sake! Yet this is done right under my nose!
The false biographies and the History Channel statement that I claim to have been involved in the creation of AIDS is just the tip of the iceberg regarding the harassment and problems that I faced in America, not the least being five hospitalizations due to “accidents” when I tried to live n Dallas, where I felt more people could hear my testimony.
Speaking out can be hazardous to one’s health, but the systematic removal of my name from the Internet has made it impossible to tell my side of the story.
Therefore, I ask you to copy this article and publish it wherever you can.
Not just for me, but as a warning of what can happen to anyone who gets in the way of the Big Boys.

BELOW IS THE FAKE BIOGRAPHY WRITTEN ABOUT ME WHICH IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE ON THE INTERNET. MY OWN CORRECTIONS AND COMMENTS ARE IN BOLD FACE.
QUESTION, AFTER READING WHAT IS BELOW: WOULD YOU TRUST WIKIPEDIA WITH YOUR LIFE STORY?
ANSWER: IF THE BIOGRAPHY IS OF A CONTROVERSIAL FIGURE, NEVER, EVER TRUST A WIKIPEDIA BIOGRAPHY. WIKIPEDIA BIOGRAPHIES ARE SYSTEMATICALLY INVADED BY ‘EDITORS’ WHO WILL NEVER ALLOW ANYTHING BUT THEIR OWN VERSION TO REACH THE PEOPLE.

HERE'S THE WIKIPEDIA MIRROR PIECE FROM INDOPEDIA:

JUDYTH VARY BAKER: HER BIOGRAPHY BY WIKIPEDIA AND “MIRROR” SITES, CORRECTED

Judyth Anne Vary Baker was born May 15, 1943 in South Bend, Indiana to Donald William and Glorianne Vary. Her sisters are Lynda and Debbee.
THE TRUTH: I HAVE ONLY ONE SISTER. DEBBEE IS A CLOSE FAMILY FRIEND!
She was raised a Christian,
THE TRUTH: I WAS RAISED IN A STRICT CATHOLIC FAMILY.
but was briefly an atheist in the early Sixties before turning on to God again in 1966.
THE TRUTH: I WAS AN ATHEIST BETWEEN 1961 AND 1969 (ALMOST 8 YEARS).
MI
Judyth1.jpg
Judyth as she is now. (PHOTO IS MISSING)
HERE IS A RECENT PHOTO:


WHAT IS PUBLISHED AS MY 'BIOGRAPHY' THEN CONTINUES ON:

1 The saga begins
2 More cancer research
3 Killers and the women who love them
4 Aftermath

The saga begins
Judyth's story begins when she was a student at Manatee High School in Bradenton, Florida with her sister. Among fellow students who remember her, opinion is about evenly split between remembering her as "intelligent" and remembering her as "weird,"
THE TRUTH: A PERSON NAMED ROBERT JOHNSON , A LONGTIME MEMBER OF JOHN MCADAMS’ NEWSGROUP, CONTACTED FORMER STUDENTS. I WAS TOLD THE MAN’S NAME BY FORMER STUDENTS, WHO WERE ASKED WHAT THEY REMEMBERED ABOUT “A WEIRD STUDENT NAMED JUDY VARY WHO WAS IN YOUR CLASS, WHO CLAIMS SHE WAS IN A SECRET PROJECT TO KILL FIDEL CASTRO.” I HAD MANY FRIENDS CONTACT ME ABOUT THE FACT THAT THEY WERE WORRIED AOUT WHO THIS PERSON WAS. MY PHOTOS ARE ALL OVER THE YEARBOOK IN SCIENCE, ART, AND CLUB ACTIVITIES. THOUGH I WAS ECCENTRIC, I WAS WELL-LIKED AND HELD POSITIONS IN VARIOUS CLUBS, WAS IN THE SOPHOMORE CLASS PLAY IN A MAJOR PART, WON THE JUNIOR CLASS MAGAZINE SALES DRIVE, WAS ON THE PROM COMMITTEE, HELD OFFICES IN CLUBS. HARDLY A SHRINKING VIOLET, I WAS OUTGOING AND FRIENDLY.
but by the age of 15, Judyth achieved a reputation as a science whiz kid, having come up with a way to extract magnesium from seawater. She appears to have been an excellent science student.
Her real passion, though, was cancer research. She started to conduct "cancer research" with mice.
WHY IS “CANCER RESEARCH” IN QUOTATION MARKS? RECORDS PROVE MY WORK WAS CONSIDERED TRUE CANCER RESEARCH. ONLY MCADAMS’ ANTI-OSWALD CRITICS DISAGREED.
Col. Philip Doyle set up a special lab for Judyth at her high school and introduced her in 1958 to CIA asset Dr. Canute Michaelson, who provided financial support for her initial work and was engaged in bioweapons research. She received a fair amount of recognition for her academic prowess, attending national workshops for science students.
THE TRUTH: ‘NATIONAL WORKSHOPS”? – AFTER CANCER RESEARCH DRS. DIEHL, MOORE AND OCHSNER MET ME AT THE SCIENCE WRITER’S SEMINAR IN ST. PETERSBURG, FL, SPRING 1961 (A MEETING I CRASHED TO GET INTO) AFTER INTERVIEWING ME AND VIEWING MY WORK, I WAS SENT BY DIEHL, THE VICE PRESIDENT OF THE AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY, AND BY HIS CLOSE FRIEND, DR. ALTON OCHSNER, TO DR. GEORGE’S MOORE’S LABORATORY TO LEARN CANCER RESEARCH TECHNIQUES THAT WERE CUTTING-EDGE. I WAS GIVEN TRAVEL MONEY BY NOBEL PRIZE WINNER DR. ROBERT ROBINSON, WHO WITH DR. UREY, ALSO A NOBLE PRIZE WINNER, GAVE ME PERSONAL INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO DESIGN MY RESEARCH PROJECTS.
FOR OVER THREE MONTHS, I WORKED AT ROSWELL PARK MEMORIAL INSITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH (NOW CALLED ROSWELL PARK INSTITUTE) IN DIRECTOR GEORGE MOORE’S OWN PERSONAL LABORATORY. I WAS ALSO ENROLLED IN THE SCIENCE RESEARCH SEMINAR SUMMER PROGRAM THAT WAS SET UP FOR SPECIALLY SELECTED SCIENCE-ORIENTED STUDENTS, TEACHERS AND YOUNG SCIENTISTS.
THE FOLLOWING MATERIAL IS OUT OF TIME SEQUENCE:
Her appearance at an [THE 1960] international science fair brought her to the attention of other medical figures with military or intelligence backgrounds, as well as top officials of the American Cancer Society: Dr. Harold Diehl and Dr. Alton Ochsner (of the famed Ochsner Cancer Clinic in New Orleans). Ochsner was to become Judyth's principal behind-the-scenes mentor through her late teen years
THE TRUTH: IN 1960, WHEN I DESCRIBED HOW I WAS REATED BY MILITARY FIGURES, ETC. I WAS TOLD I HAD BEEN ‘CONSCRIPTED’ BY THE CIA. I NOW BELIEVE I WAS SIMPLY NOTICED BY THE CIA AT THIS TIME. THE LOYALTY OATH I SIGNED 9WHICH CONVINCED TWO RESEARCHERS THAT I HAD BEEN CONSCRIPTED, AND WHICH I NAIVELY BELIEVED MUS HAVE BEEN THE CASE) WAS REQUIRED IN THE STATE OF INDIANA TO RECEIVE SCHOLARSHIPS AT THAT TIME. I WAS BORN IN INDIANA AND ATER GRADUATION AND WORK AT ROSWELL PARK, RETURNED TO INDIANA FOR COLLEGE ON A FULL SCHOLARSHIP.
More cancer research
Judyth's lab was soon expanded and she received research materials from doctors at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Eli Lilly, Oak Ridge, et al. As of September 2, 1960, Dr. David Jacobus at Walter Reed was supplying her with chemicals and promising more.
She was forced to take a loyalty oath
THE TRUTH: I WAS NOT FORCED. I WAS TOLD THAT I WAS REQUIRED TO DO SDO IF I WAS TO RECEIVE SCHOLARSHIPS AND UNIVERSITY SUPPORT FOR FURTHER RESEARCH.. ONLY YEARS LATER DID I LEARN THIS WAS A REQUIREMENT TO GET STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOLARSHIPS IN INDIANA. LOOK IT UP IN INDIANA STATUTES. .THIS EVENT OCCURRED AT THE SCIENCE FAIR, NOT EARLIER OR LATER AS IMPLIED IN THIS SO-CALLEDF ‘BIOGRAPHY.’
and, while still in high school, was required to learn conversational Russian
THE TRUTH: I WASN’T “REQUIRED,” I WAS ADVISED AND ENCOURAGED,TO DO SO, AND WAS INTERESTED IN DOING SO. NOBODY WAS GOING TO TEACH CONVERSATIONAL RUSSIAN AT NIGHT AT MANATEE JR. COLLEGE AT THAT TIME—THE NIGHT CLASS HAD BEEN CANCELED WHEN THE PRIOR INSTRUCTOR MOVED ON -- SO RETIRED MILITARY FRIENDS OF COL. DOYLE FOUND DR. CONCEVITCH TEACHING RUSSIAN IN SARASOTA, FL AND ASKED HIM TO TEACH A NIGHT CLASS. HE AGREED.
ABOUT 15 PEOPLE ATTENDED THESE CLASSES. THUS I LEARNED SOME CONVERSATIONAL RUSSIAN AND SOME WRITTEN RUSSIAN.

at a local junior college
AT MANATEE JUNIOR COLLEGE. I HAVE A LETTER FROM MY MOTHER DATED CHRISTMAS, 2000, EXPLAINING THAT I DID NOT HAVE TO PAY FOR THIS RUSSIAN COURSE (“IT WAS FUNDED.”). WHO PAID FOR IT? THE RETIRED MILITARY OFFICERS WHO WERE FRIENDS OF COL. PHILIP DOYLE.
from a Dr. Concevitch who sent her letters in yellow mailing envelopes.

HOW IN HEAVEN’S NAME DID DR. CONCEVICH’S CHRISTMAS AND EASTER CARDS AND OCCASIONAL LETTERS GET MORPHED INTO BEING PLACED IN YELLOW ENVELOPES? NEVER HAPPENED! HERE IS A TYPICAL CARD SENT TO ME FROM MY RUSSIAN INSTRUCTOR, DR. CONCEVICH:

She still does not know why she had to learn it.
THE TRUTH: OF COURSE I KNEW WHY I HAD TO LEARN IT. I WAS INTERESTED BECAUSE I WANTED TO READ SCIENTIFIC CANCER RESEARCH ARTICLES WRITTEN IN RUSSIAN, AND THE MILITARY OFFICERS THOUGHT RUSSIAN WAS SOMETHING I SHOULD KNOW, AS WELL.
She did know that Michaelson had somehow targeted her for future intelligence use.
THIS MAY BE TRUE, BUT I CANNOT PROVE IT. THOUGH WE HAVE A NEWSPAPER ARTICLE ABOUT HIM AND HIS ESPIONAGE ACTIVITIES (SEE ME & LEE: HOW I CAME TO KNOW, LOVE AND LOSE LEE HARVEY OSWALD), NO RECORDS OF DR. CANUTE MICHAELSON NOW EXIST ON THE INTERNET. WE BELIEVE THEY WERE REMOVED, ALONG WITH OTHER SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS, ESPECIALLY FROM OAK RIDGE, WHICH ARE IN MY POSSESSION BUT ARE NO LONGER AVAILABLE ON THE INTERNET..
Her work came to the attention of Florida Senator George Smathers, a close friend of JFK's, who encouraged her to write to the President
THE TRUTH: I WAS ASKED AT THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE FAIR IN 1960, BY PERSONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE MILITARY AND ELI LILLY, TO WRITE TO ‘THE PRESIDENT.’ I THOUGHT THEY ASKED ME TO WRITE TO PRES. KENNEDY YEARS LATER, WHEN ASKED ABOUT THIS REQUEST.
IN FACT, BEING VERY BUSY, I DIDN’T GET AROUND TO WRITING THE LETTER FOR MONTHS, AND BY THEN, KENNEDY WAS PRESIDENT. CRITICS HAVE STATED HAT BECAUSE I SAID I WAS ASKED TO WRITE TO PRESIDENT KENNEDY (HAVING FORGOTTEN I DIDN’T WRITE THE LETTER UNTIL MONTHS LATER) THAT I HAVE ‘CHANGED’ MY STORY. THAT’S ABSURD. IT WAS A MEMORY ERROR BASED ON THE FACT THAT THE LETTER WAS WRITTEN TO KENNEDY WHEN I FINALLY GOT AROUND TO IT.
ON ANOTHER NOE, HOW MANY HIGH SCHOOL SUDENTS WRITE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED SATES? I DID. I WAS, AND STLL AM, A PATRIOT WHO WAS WILLING TO DO WHATEVER MY COUNTRY ASKED.
I HAD FULL FAITH IN OUR GOVERNMENT AND TRUSTED EVERYONE IN IT.
THAT WAS A FOOLISH ERROR ON MY PART.
A COPY OF MY LETTER TO PRESIDENT KENNEDY,

AND A REPLY FROM RALPH DUNGAN, A SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT, IN LATIN AMERICAN AFFAIRS, CAN BE SEEN JUST BELOW.
and volunteer to put her talents to work in the service of her country. She soon got a reply from the White House.
THE TRUTH: DIDN’T GET A REPLY FOR MONTHS.
THE LETTER I WROTE TO JFK WAS FOUND IN THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES BY RESEARCHER ANTHONY MARSH.
While not very dramatic, she soon received fresh supplies, as Sen. Smathers told her she would.
THE TRUTH: A STORY ABOUT MY CANCER RESEARCH WAS PRINTED IN HUNDREDS OF NEWSPAPERS ACROSS THE COUNTRY. I EVEN RECEIVED TELEGRAMS, INCLUDING ONE FROM ARTHUR GODFREY AND ONE FROM BERTRAND RUSSELL/ I RECEIVED FRESH SUPPLIES AFTER THE NEWSPAPER ARTICLES CAME OUT, PLUS DONATIONS TO A BANK ACCOUNT SET UP FOR ME BY MY SCHOOL.

Killers and the women who love them

==JOHN MCADAMS POSTED ON WIKIPEDIA IN 2008 THAT HE WROTE THIS SECTION OF MY SO-CALLED ‘BIOGRAPHY’--'KILLERS AND THE WOMEN WHO LOVE THEM,' YES, HE LABELS LEE HARVEY OSWALD OUTRIGHT AS A 'KILLER.' WHERE IS HIS OBJECTIVITY AND HONESTY? I AM THUS LABELED AS THE LOVER OF A 'KILLER' IN 'MY' BIOGRAPHY.==
The interesting time in her life was the summer of 1963, when she was in New Orleans. It was there that she began a torrid sexual affair
THE TRUTH: READ THE BOOK!
with Lee Harvey Oswald, in spite of having been recently married on May 2, 1963 to Robert Allison Baker III, a student and future petroleum geologist who was working for an oil company.
THE TRUTH: ROBERT BAKER MARRIED ME AND LEFT THE NEXT DAY FOR WORK IN THE GULF OF MEXICO WITH ALMOST NO WARNING. A RAID ON THE ‘MANSION’ BY POLICE OCCURRED THE SAME NIGHT. I WAS THROWN INTO THE STREETS. MY NEW HUSBAND DID NOT GIVE ME A PHONE NUMBER TO REACH HIM BECAUSE HE KNEW I WAS UPSET WITH HIM AND MIGHT CALL HIM. I WAS ON MY OWN FOR WEEKS, AND LATER, FOR MONTHS, LEFT ALONE AND NEGLECTED IN NEW ORLEANS BY MY NEW HUSBAND. READ THE BOOK TO LEARN HOW LEE CAME TO MY RESCUE AT THAT TIME, AND THEN, READ ABOUT HOW, LATER, WE FELL IN LOVE.
What brought Judyth and Lee together was a plot,
THE TRUTH: WHAT REALLY BROUGH US TOGETHER WAS LEE’S RESCUE OF ME FROM THE POLICE RAID. MY WORK FOR DR. MARY SHERMAN BROUGHT US TOGETHER. OSWALD WAS SPYING ON THE PROJECT FOR THE CIA, AMONG MANY OTHER DUTIES, AND WAS ALREADY INVOLVED BEFORE I WAS WITH OCHSNER, DAVID FERRIE AND DR. SHERMAN..SEE EDWARD T. HASLAM’S BOOK, DR.MARY’S MONKEY, FOR DETAILS, AS WELL AS MY BOOK.
centered in New Orleans, to produce a bioweapon for the purpose of killing Fidel Castro. The plotters got them both cover jobs at the Reily Coffee Company while they were carrying on an affair
THE TRUTH: MCADAMS LIES HERE. HE KNOWS THAT LEE HARVEY OSWALD AND JUDYTH VARY BAKER WORKED TOGETHER FOR WEEKS BEFORE THEIR LOVE AFFAIR WAS IN FULL BLOOM. HE PREFERS TO PAINT IT IN THE WORST POSSIBLE LIGHT.
and trying to produce a 'cocktail' to administer to Castro. The 'cocktail' would include both a virus designed to knock out Castro's immune system, and cancer cells that would infect him and cause his death.
THE TRUTH: HOW IT WAS DEVELOPED, AND USED, IS DESCRIBED IN DETAIL IN BOTH EDWARD T. HASLAM’S BOOK, DR. MARY’S MONKEY, AND IN MY BOOK, ME & LEE: HOW I CAME TO KNOW, LOVE AND LOSE LEE HARVEY OSWALD. I ASK ALL OF YOU TO PRAY FOR MCADAMS, WHO MUST FACE GOD FOR HIS SPREADING OF LIES ABOUT ME AND OTHERS WHO ARE TELLING YOU THE TRUTH, AT RISK OF OUR LIVES.
Other participants in the plot included David Ferrie � every conspiracy author's favorite suspect �
THE TRUTH: DAVID FERRIE IS MENTIONED SO OFTEN BECAUSE HE WAS INVOLVED IN THE PLOTTING IN NEW ORLEANS, PRECEDING THE ASSASSINATION, AS WAS LEE. READ MY BOOK.
and Dr. Mary Sherman, a physician
MCADAMS LEAVES OUT THE FACT THAT DR. SHERMAN WAS A WORLD FAMED CANCER RESEARCH SCIENTIST. HE ATTACKED ME IN 1999, MCADAMS TOLD READERS DR. SHERMAN WAS NOT A CANCER RESEARCHER. THOUGH IT HAS NOW BEEN ERASED FROM THE INTERNET, NOTE THAT IN THE BIOGRAPHY, MCADAMS STILL DOES NOT MENTION THAT DR. SHERMAN WAS A CANCER RESEARCH SCIENTIST, ONLY CALLING HER ‘A PHYSICIAN’. BUT HERE’S WHAT THE WALL STREET JOURNAL’S FRONT PAGE STORY ABOUT HER MURDER TELLS YOU:
JFKMURDERSOLVED.COM RESEARCHER WIM DANKBAAR TOLD THE EDUCATION FORUM ABOUT THE MCADAMS DECEPTION: MCADAMS HAD TOLD READERS THAT DR. SHERMAN WAS NOT A CANCER RESEARCH SCIENTIST, SAYING SHE WAS MERELY “AN ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON” (ONE OF HER SPECIALITIES)..
AND IN MY BIOGRAPHY, MCADAMS IGNORES SHERMAN’S CANCER EXPERTISE, SAYING ONLY:

…a physician at the Oschner Clinic.
Here’s what Wim Dankbaar wrote:
From: dank@xs4all.nl
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 3:55 AM
To: Judyth Vary Baker
Cc: john.simkin@ntlworld.com
Subject: Re: PROOF JOHN McADAMS CAN LIE

Nice work !

Wim

> For some time on Education Forum, you, John Simkins, have shown how Dr.
> John McAdams twists the truth to suit his aims.
>
> I have here, in this post, absolute proof of this, and I ask that you
> make an issue of this, as he used the point that Dr. Mary Sherman was
> NOT a cancer researcher to attack me. First, you´ll see his post of
> July 25, 2000, where McAdams identifies Dr. DSherman as a ´cancer
> researcher.´ Next, you will see in his attack post, where he claims Dr.
> Sherman was just an orthopedic surgeonm, and uses my claim that she was
> a cancer researcher to ´prove´I am not credible!
>
> .john is thus caught in his own lie...you will also notice that he
> declares I claimed to do the research in N.O. right oput of high
> school...he is shameless!
> Again, the best part is that he declares Dr. Sherman a ´cancer
> researcher.´ But LATER, he claims Dr. Sherman was just an orthopedic
> surgeon...this is what he does when it suits him to impugn my
> credibility. enjoy! °°Judyth
>
>
> THE JULY 25, 2000 QUOTE
>
>
> quote on (portion of Reitzes´comment included for context)
>
>
>>Subject: Re: Perry Raymond Russo comes clean
>>From: John.McAdams@marquette.edu (John McAdams)
>>Date: 7/25/00 10:31 PM Eastern Daylight Time
>>Message-id: <397e4d17.12747205@mcadams.posc.mu.edu>
>>
>>SNIP.(REITZES WROTE)>>...Russo said also that the DA's office was
> making every effort to pin two murder charges on Shaw. Those being the
> killing of a 14 or 15 year old boy of name Jimmy Rupp and the killing
> of Dr. Sherman on St. Charles Avenue..,,,>SNIP,,,,,,
>
> (NcADAMS)...Was this Dr. Mary Sherman, the cancer researcher who
> supposedly had
>>(but in reality didn't have) connections with Ferrie?
>
>
>>.John
>
>
> END QUOTE
>
>
> .....................NOW READ THIS, AND NOTICE THE DATE.....July 9,
> 2003.................!!!!!!
>
> quote on
>
> From: John McAdams (john.mcadams@marquette.edu)
> Subject: What's wrong with Judyth's account?
> View: Complete Thread (96 articles)
> Original Format
> Newsgroups: alt.assassination.jfk
> Date: 2003-07-09 21:19:07 PST
>
>
> I'm posting this as the beginning of critique of the "Judyth" account.
> It's intended to be a list of the problems with her story.
>
> Please, anybody feel free to jump in and add items, or contest any.
>
> ...snip....
>
> IMPLAUSIBLE ELEMENTS IN HER STORY
>
> 1. The CIA hiring a girl right out of high school to be a cancer
> researcher.
>
> 2. David Ferrie as a cancer researcher.
>
> 3. Mary Sherman as a cancer researcher. (Sherman was a well-known
> orthopedic surgeon.)
>
THEREFORE, TO GET THE TRUTH, PLEASE READ MY BOOK, ED HASLAM'S BOOK, DOUGLAS HORNE'S BOOKS, JIM MARRS' BOOKS, AND JAMES DOUGLASS' BOOKS, AMONG MANY OTHER FINE ONES THAT STAND FIRMLY AGAINST THE LIES AND LIBEL WRITTEN ABOUT LEE OSWALD AND WITNESSES AS TO HIS INNOCENCE. McAdams goes on:
The research was done in the apartments of Ferrie and Sherman.
THE TRUTH: MCADAMS MAKES IT SEEM THAT WORK WAS ONLY CONDUCTED IN THESE TWO PLACES, WHEN MUCH MORE WAS INVOLVED. HE APPARENTLY WISHES TO INSERT ‘UNBELIEVABILITY’ INTO HIS CONTRIVED, FALSE EQUATION. THE RESEARCH WAS DONE IN A RING OF LABS THAT INCLUDED FERRIE’S KITCHEN AND DR. SHERMAN’S APARTMENT AS LINKS TO SOPHISTICATED LABS WHERE MATERIALS WERE SECRETLY BEING DELIVERED AFTER PROPER PREPARATION OF MICE AND TAKING THEIR TUMORS. SEE EDWARD T. HASLAM’S BOOK, DR. MARY’S MONKEY, FOR MORE DETAILS.
THE TRUE EVENTS ARE THEN CONTRACTED TO A SINGLE SENTENCE THAT LEAVES OUT MUCH:

Oswald's famous trip to Mexico City was for the purpose of delivering the poison 'cocktail' to an agent who would see to it that it got into Cuba and was administered to Castro. Oswald made it to Mexico City, but unfortunately the agent never arrived to claim the materials, and the plotters decided to kill John Kennedy instead.
COMMENT BY JVB: THIS IS WHAT WE ASSUMED.
However, instead of using their sophisticated bioweapon concoction on him, they decided to simply shoot him.
DOES HE MEAN ATTEMPTS TO KILL KENNEDY? THE SLOPPY GENERALIZATION CONFUSES THE READER.
THE TRUTH: MANY ATTEMPTS TO KILL CASTRO WERE MADE BY THE CIA—INCLUDING EXPLODING SEASHELLS, AND A WETSUIT FOR DIVING LACED WITH BOTULISM TOXIN. A PEN FILLED WITH BLACKLEAF-40, A WEED KILLER, WAS ALSO CREATED TO TRY TO INJECT CASTRO. ALL ATTEMPTS, HOWEVER, FAILED. WHEN CASTRO WAS NOT KILLED WITHIN A SPECIFIC TIME RANGE, I WAS TOLD THEY DECIDED TO KILL KENNEDY INSTEAD. ONE OF MANY REASONS TO SLAY KENNEDY WAS TO GAIN CONTROL OF CUBA’S DESTINY THROUGH LYNDON JOHNSON.
PRESIDENTS EVER SINCE HAVE FELT THE PRESSURE “BEHIND THE SCENES.”

Oswald, who liked Kennedy, was an unwilling participant in the plot, but never defected nor told the authorities about the plan.
THE TRUTH: OSWALD RISKED HIS LIFE TO WARN THE FBI ABOUT PLOTS TO KILL KENNEDY. HE REMAINED IN THE ASSASSINATION RING TO GAHER INFORMATION. HOOVER OF THE FBI WANTED OSWALD DEAD ASAP SO HIS ACTIVITIES COULD NOT BE DISCOVERED AS AN ATTEMPT TO SAVE THE PRESIDENT.
ABRAHAM BOLDEN, A SECRET SERVICE AGENT, SAID INFORMATION FFROM AN INFORMANT NAMED “LEE” SAVED KENNEDY’S LIFE BY INFORMING THE FBI IN CHICAG. THE MATER HAS BEEN FOUND TO BE TRUE. IT IS QUOTED EXTENSIVELY IN JAMES DOUGLASS’ BOOK, JFK AND THE UNSPEAKABLE: WHY HE DIED AND WHY IT MATTERS. MORE EVIDENCE ABOUT LEE’S INNOCENCE CAN BE FOUND IN DOUGLAS HORNE’S FINE BOOK, INSIDE THE ARRB.
IN MY BOOK, I DESCRIBE HOW LEE HAD JOINED AN ‘ABORT TEAM’ THAT WAS TRYING TO SAVE KLENNEDY’S LIFE. OSWALD PENETRATED THE ASSASSINATION RING AND LEARNED THAT THE GOVERNMENT ITSELF WAS INVOLVED IN HELPING ARRANGE KENNEDY’S ASSASSINATION—AND WOULD COVER IT UP.

MCADAMS SPREADS THE OFFICIAL STORY THAT GETS THE GOVERNMENT OFF THE HOOK.
THIS IS WHY LEE OSWALD WAS SHOT IN BROAD DAYLIGHT WHILE IN POLICE CUSTODY, AND WHY I HAVE TO LIVE IN EXILE, AFTER NCREDIBLE LIES AND HARASSMENT AGAINST ME. ON THE HISTORY CHANNEL, INTERNET, AND IN THE NEWSPAPERS.
THUS I MUST RELY ON GOOD, HONEST PEOPLE TO HELP ME SURVIVE IN
MY YEARS OF EXILE.
THE BIOGAPHY GOES ON WITH WHAT I HAVE ONLY SPECULATED ABOUT:
He was in Dealey Plaza as a shooter, but intentionally missed Kennedy, although other shooters, of course, killed the President.
IT IS JUST SPECULATION, BASED ON LEE’S LAST CONVERSATION WITH ME, AS TO WHAT LEE ACTUALLY DID. ONE THING FOR CERTAIN: LEE HARVEY OSWALD, THE ACCUSED ASSASSIN, NEVER SHOT AT KENNEDY. ANYONE WITH MORE THAN A DOUBLE-DIGIT IQ UNDERSTANDS THIS, UNLESS THEY’RE BEING PAID TO SAY OTHERWISE OR HAVE SOMETHING INVESTED IN PUSHING THE “OSWALD-DID-IT” MANTRA.
Lee and Judyth had planned to meet in Mexico should he make it out okay, but he never made it, dying November 24, 1963.
THE BIOGRAPHY FAILS TO MENTION THAT THE DALLAS POLICE STILL PARADED LEE OSWALD OUT AT THE ‘RIGHT’ TIME – WHEN JACK RUBY GOT THERE—AND LET RUBY COME FORWARD AND SHOOT LEE. SICKENING, BECAUSE THE POLICE HAD RECEIVED WARNINGS HAT IF THEY DID SO, OSWALD WOULD BE SHOT. BUT THAT’S WHAT THE POLICE AND THE GOVERNMENT WANTED.
Judyth has completed her own article on this subject, "Judyth Vary Baker and the Exoneration of Lee Harvey Oswald," in addition to an article (based on the last chapter of her upcoming book) called "Before the Silence Came: Lee's Last Telephone Calls."
THE TRUTH: THE BIOGRAPHY CITES A PIECE FROM MY STOLEN BOOK, WHICH WAS PUBLISHED WTHOUT MY PERMISSION OR AUTHORIZATION, FOR WHICH I AM NOT RESPONSIBLE. ON MCADAMS’ WEBSITE, HE THANKS A NUMBER OF PEOPLE FOR HELOING HIM WRITE HIS LIES ABOUT ME. ALMOST TO A MAN, THEY NEVER MET ME.
Aftermath
In 1964, before omerta was applied to the participants in the JFK/Castro matter, Judyth published a story collection called Her Way and Other Science Fiction Stories. The title story, originally called "Her Story,"
THE TRUTH: “HER Way” has never been published. My science fiction short story collection has never been published. I intend to publish the collection in 2011. I will include “Her Way” in the collection.
was co-written with Lee Oswald. Judyth had always been interested in writing, particularly poetry and screenwriting. The rest is best described in her essay, "My Boring Life,"
“MY BORING LIFE” WAS SENT TO A ‘FRIEND’ WHO GAVE IT TO MCADAMS.
IT IS A LIST OF THE MANY ADVENTURES I INDEED HAVE HAD IN MY (AT THAT TIME) 59 YEARS OF LIFE. I HAVE BEEN A NEWSPAPER REPORTER, MOTHER OF FIVE, HAVE A DEGREE IN ANTHROPOLOGY, AND WAS MARRIED TO A GEOLOGIST, SO I HAVE TRAVELED A LOT.
AND THERE WAS MUCH MORE HAT HAPPENED AS A REPORTER AND AS AN ARTIST WITH A PENCHANT FOR ANTHROPOLOGY.
“MY BORING LIFE” WAS WRITTEN IN RESPONSE TO A FALSE STATEMENT THAT I WAS A ‘BORED LOUISIANA HOUSEWIFE’ LOOKING FOR EXCITEMENT BY WRITING ABOUT LEE OSWALD (!). I WAS TEACHING AT A UNIVERSITY IN LOUISIANA AT THE TIME, AFTER SPENDING YEARS IN TEXAS, MEXICO, NORWAY, AND FLORIDA.

In 1965, she received an AA at the University of Florida while living in Gainesville with her husband. By the next year, however, she was living in and around Houston,
THE TRUTH: WE MOVED TO HOUSTON, WHERE I LIVED FOR THE NEXT 18 YEARS, WITH TWO SUMMERS SPENT IN MEXICO AND FLORIDA.
participating in various things. She then moved to the mountains of Saltillo, Mexico.
She has written many novels, including one called "Six Foot Seven," written in 1967, which focuses on Oswald, his friend Gerry Patrick Hemming (the title is a reference to his height), and her feelings of betrayal at the whole JFK/Castro matter. She wrote it while in the Saltillo mountains and had many additional adventures while there.
THE ABOVE IS ABOUT THE ONLY TRUE STATEMENT IN THE ENTIRE SO-CALLED BIOGRAPHY.
In 1968, she had her first child,xxxxx. She ended up having four more children (xxxx,xxxx,xxxx,xxxx). In the midst of parenthood, however, she was still mixed up in old entanglements to the man who nearly hit Castro and killed JFK.
THE TRUTH: I REFUSE TO HAVE MY CHILDREN'S NAMES MENTIONED IN THIS BOGUS BIOGRAPHY! AND NOBODY IN HOUSTON KNEW ABOUT “ME & LEE” UNTIL AN INCIDENT OCCURRED WHERE A GREEN GLASS LEE GAVE ME WAS ABOUT TO BE BROKEN, AND I CALLED OUT TO MY SON SO HE WOULD NOT HARM THE GLASS. THIS WAS HEARD BY MANY FRIENDS, AS WE WERE HAVING A PARTY. MY LONGTIME FRIEND SHERRY OHNMEISS HAS RECENTLY TATED RECALLING THAT THIS EVENT (IN 1981) OCCURRED.
In 1973, she was named as a consultant to the Ochsner Lung Cancer Research Laboratory Fund in New Orleans, though it is unclear whether she actually served in that capacity or was named in that capacity to keep her mouth shut.
NOT TRUE.THE TRUTH: AN OCHSNER CLINIC ‘APPOINTMENT’ FOR ME WAS MADE IN 1963, NOT 1973. THE NAME OF THE APPOINTMENT IS ALSO INCORRECT. I WAS NAMED AS AN INTERN IN DR. MARY SHERMAN’S BONE ONCOLOGY LAB. WHAT HAPPENED TO THE DOCUMENTATION FOR THAT, I DO NOT KNOW.
By 1986, she was cutting through personal problems and attending the University of Houston, where she graduated that year with a BS in anthropology. This degree led to a lifelong interest in archaeology and anthropology.
THE TRUTH: A LIFELONG INTEREST IN ARCHEOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY LED TO OBTAINING THE B.S. DEGREE IN ANTHROPOLOGY IN 1986 DESPITE A HEAVY SCHEDULE AND DOING THE LAST WORK IN NORWAY IN AN ARCHEOLOGY DIG THERE, ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEGREE.
The next year, she divorced Robert Baker, left entanglements he had set her up with, and moved temporarily to Norway.
THE TRUTH: ROBERT BAKER DIVORCED ME, NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND.
I LEFT ROBERT WHILE WE WERE LIVING IN NOWWAY DUE TO LONG-TERM PROBLEMS IN THE MARRIAGE, INCLUDING RELIGIOUS PROBLEMS. I BECAME A BORN-AGAIN CHRISTIAN AND MY HUSBAND REACTED ADVERSELY, MAKING IT HARD TO LIVE WITH HIM. HE DIVORCED ME IN 1987. WE WERE LIVING IN NORWAY AND I LEFT NORWAY AND RETURNED TO THE UNITED SATES. THIS IS BACKWARDS!

It was now 1996 when she caught up with herself. She had gotten far and accomplished much more than is put here or even in her essay. Only three or four years before had she been running several companies, including the Living History Corporation (a for-profit corporation situated in the state of Florida, dissolved in 1991), the American Genome Society (a not-for-profit corporation situated in the state of Florida, with a Louisiana address, which solicited donations that were anywhere from $25 to $100), and the American Cream Puppy Breeders' Association (linked with her new dog breed, the American Cream Dog), not to mention running a magazine of creative writing at about the same time and editing for a college magazine.
THE TRUTH: TOO MANY ERRORS TO LIST! I NEVER RAN “SEVERAL COMPANIES.” Just one:
“Living History Corporation” which was involved with art. The ‘business’ with the dogs was raising and training some special dogs dogs for the handicapped and the blind. It was a labor of love because I care for my fellow human beings.

She moved back to the US and back to Florida to be closer to her sisters and parents. She attended the University of Central Florida and graduated with an MA in creative writing and linguistics. She then felt like moving again
THE TRUTH: MY ONLY SISTER LIVED IN TEXAS, NOT FLORIDA. I RETURNED TO FLORIDA FOR THE CHILDREN’S SAKE, TO BE CLOSE TO THEIR GRANDPARENTS. I RAISED FOUR FINE CHILDREN AS A SINGLE PARENT.
I MOVED TO LOUISIANA NOT BECAUSE I ‘FELT LIKE MOVING AGAIN’ BUT BECAUSE I WAS OFFERED A FELLOWSHIP AT THE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETTE AND DECIDED TO MOVE THERE, TO GET MY DOCORATE IN ENGLISH, AND PARTLY TO SEE IF I COULD FIND ANYONE WHO REMEMBERED “ME & LEE.”
and wound up back in a familiar place that opened old wounds: New Orleans.
THE TRUTH: I DID NOT MOVE TO NEW ORLEANS. I MOVED TO LAFAYETTE, LA, QUITE A DISTANCE FROM NEW ORLEANS, AND DID NOT NEED A JOB. I WAS OFFERED A FELLOWSHIP AND A TEACHING POSITION AT THE UNIVERSITY.
She needed a job
THE TRUTH: I HAD PLENTY OF JOBS IN FLIORIDA BUT WANTED TO CONTINUE MY EDUCATION IN THE FIELD OF ENGLISH. I MADE APPLICATIONS TO SEVERAL UNIVERSITIE AND ACCEPTED THE FELLOWSHIP OFFER FROM U OF LA AT LAFAYETTE (THEN CALLED SW U AT LAFAYETE) AND MOVED TO LAFAYETTE TO TEACH AT THE UNIVERSITY, WHILE PURSING MY DOCTOR’S DEGREE IN ENGLISH THERE.
and soon found a welcome one as an instructor at Southwestern University in Lafayette, Louisiana. No sooner had she gotten there than she published another short story collection, A Place When the Sun Goes Down.
THE TRUTH: THIS COLLECTION WAS PUBLISHED A YEAR EARLIER BEFORE MOVING TO LOUISIANA.
She was also running many things out of her office at La Griffin Hall on university grounds.
THE TRUTH: I “RAN” NOTHING “OUT OF” MY “OFFICE AT LA GRIFFIN HALL ON UNIVERSITY GROUNDS” ONLY UNIVERSITY BUSINESS! I WAS GIVEN A PRIVATE OFFICE WHERE STUDENTS CAME FOR EXTRA HELP, FOR I TAUGHT CLASSES IN ENGLISH, ENGLISH COMPOSITION, REMEDIAL ENGLISH, AND DRAMA AND POETRY; I ALSO TUTORED STUDENTS IN ENGLISH AND MATH, AND CNDUCTED SOME EXTENDED LEARNING CLASSES IN ARCHEOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY FOR NIGHT STUDENTS.
I ALSO PRESENTED ENGLISH RESEARCH PAPERS IN INGUISTICS AT MLA AND SIMILAR ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND POPUILAR CULTURE PROFESSIIONAL CONFERENCES. I ALSO HELPED EDIT ONE OF THE ENGLISH DEPARTMENT’S LITERARY JOURNALS.

We have to explain here that though she wasn't exactly keeping out of the public eye, she also wasn't using her real (or known) name either. She published at various times under the name Marianne Whiting or Judyth Avary Baker or even as Avary Baker.
THE TRUTH: BECAUSE I WAS LIVING IN LOUISIANA, I WAS AFRAID TO USE MY NAME AS SEEN IN 1963, DUE TO SOMEBODY RECOGNIZING ME, SO I USED ‘AVARY BAKER’ AT THE UNIVERSITY. I ALSO, OVER THE YEARS, PUBLISHED UNDER MANY NAMES NOT MENTIONED HERE,NOT JUST WHLE IN LOUISIANA, TO PROTECT ME FROM PEOPLE WHO MIGHT HAVE RECOGNIZED MY ACTUAL NAME.
In 1999, she completed a book about her relationship with Oswald called From Dallas With Love: Lee Harvey Oswald and Judyth Vary -- Their Love.
THE TRUTH: MY LITERARY AGENT REWORKED THE BOOK AND I NEVER SAW ‘HIS’ VERSION UNTIL HE MET WITH ME AND HAD ALREADY SENT IT OUT TO PUBLISHERS! THIS WAS A TEASER BOOK WITH LITTLE INFORMATION IN IT, BUT THE AGENT ADDED UNTRUE DETAILS AND EVEN CONCOCTED A STORY THAT A WOMAN MY ENEMIES THOUGHT WAS ME HAD BEEN SHOT IN MEXICO, AND THAT I WAS HIDING IN EUROPE. IRONICALLY, NOW I AM HIDING IN EROPE, AFTER PERSSTENT LIES AND PERSECUTION FORCED ME OVERSEAS FOR MY SAFETY.
THE AGENT TOLD ME THE NAME OF THE BOOK (HIS ‘ENHANCED’ VERSION) WAS “LEE, MY LOVE.” I CALLED IT “THE OSWALD CONNECTION” “THE LONELY BLL” OR “COMRADE LEE” DEPENDING ON WHO HAD THE MANUSCRIPT AND WHO I SPOKE TO, SO I COULD KEEP TRACK IF ANY CHANGES WERE MADE BY ANYONE READING IT, AFTER THE ‘CHANGING THE STORY” EXPERIENCE WITH THE AGENT, WHO FOR HIS ATTEMPTS TO SENSATIONALIZE MY PAST, AND FOR OTHER REASONS,WAS FIRED.

She first came forward by posting an ambiguous review of a book about JFK-related things by Ed Haslam at Amazon.com under the name "Avary Baker."
NOT TRUE. THE WRITER IS TRYING TO LINK ME WITH ED HASLAM, WHOM I KNEW NOTHING ABOUT UNTIL LATE IN 1999. MUCH LATER IN THE YEAR, I WROTE A REVIEW OF HIS FIRST BOOK ABOUT DR. MARY SHERMAN, CALLED MARY, FERRIE AND THE MONKEY VIRUS.THE WHOLE TRUTH: THE ‘BIOGRAPHER(S) FAIL TO MENTION SIXTY MINUTES HAD BEGUN INVESTIGATING MY STORY.
I HAD REFUSED AN OFFER FROM THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER (ON THE INTERNET, A HIGHLY BLOATED AMT. OF $$$ IS QUOTED AS COMING FROM ME—IT WAS NEVER THAT MUCH!)---BUT I WANTED TO HAVE THE STORY COME OUT WITHOUT ANY MONEY INVOLVED.
THEREFORE, I APPROACHED ‘FORTY-EIGHT HOURS,’ BUT THEY, AFTER INTERROGATING ME, PASSED THE STORY ON TO SIXTY MINUTES.

THUS, I FIRST CAME FORWARD TO SIXTY MINUTES RELATIVELY EARLY IN 1999. SIXTY MINUTES INVESTIGATORS ASKED ME MANY QUESTIONS ABOUT LEE, EVEN INCLUDING HIS ANATOMY. WHEN I ANSWERED CORRECTLY, THEY BEGAN A 14-MONTH INVESTIGATION THAT WAS THE LONGEST IN THEIR HISTORY. SEVERAL PEOPLE DERAILED THEIR INVESTIGATION. AS DON HEWITT PUT IT, TO C-SPAN: “THE DOOR WAS SLAMMED IN OUR FACES.” THEY TRIED THREE TIMES TO FILM THE STORY. IT KEPT GETTING CANCELED. PHIL SCHEFFLER, A CO=PRODUCER OF SIXCTY MINUTES WITH HEWITT, SENT ME AND OTHERS AN EMAIL SAYING “WE DID NOT WALK AWAY FROM THIS STORY.”
SOON AFTER SIXTY MINUTES BEGAN INVESTIGATING ME, I CONTACTED DR. HOWARD PLATZMAN, THEN HE CONTACTED HIS FRIEND MARTIN SHACKELFORD. I HAD BEEN OBSERVING THEIR COMMENTS ON A NEWSGROUP, THE ONLY ONE I KNEW ABOUT.SADLY, IT WAS MCADAMS’ DISINFO NEWSGROUP ABOUT LEE.I HAD VERY LITTLE EXPERIENCE AND ACTUALLY TRUSTED MCADAMS’ NEWSGROUP! SO MUCH FOR MY SO-CALLED INTERNET RESEARCH—I EXPOSED MYSELF TO THE NASTIEST, MEANEST NEWSGROUP IN EXISTENCE CONCERNING THE ASSASSINATION AND ANYBODY WHO TRIES TO SAY LEE OSWALD WAS INNOCENT.
AFTER I POSTED FOR THE FIRST TIME THERE, I WAS IMMEDIATELY ATTACKED. BEFORE THEY KNEW HOW TO SPELL MY NAME PROPERLY, I WAS DUBBED A FRAUD!
SO MUCH FOR MY ‘RESEARCH ON THE INTERNET’ I REPEAT, THEY CLAIM I RESEARCHED THE INTERNET FOR YEARS BEFORE SPEAKING OUT. IF SO, WHY DID I FIRST POST ON MCADAMS’ NEWSGROUP? BECAUSE I DIDN’T KNOW THERE WERE ANY OTHER NEWSGROUPS. I KNEW NOTHING ABOUT THE INTERNET’S COMPOSITION. MY DAUGHTER HAD THE COMPUTER—I HAD BEEN INVOLVED ONLY IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE RESEARCH WHERE THE UNIVERSITY COMPUTER LAB GAVE ME URL’S TO FIND. I DID NOT KNOW GOOGLE EXISTED (IT WAS THEN IN ITS INFANCY). WHAT A SHOCK TO FIND OUT THEY WERE ATTACKING ME BEFORE THEY KNEW HOW TO SPELL MY NAME CORRECTLY!
Then she and her supporters took to the newsgroups.
NOT TRUE. SEE ABOVE. THIS IS MCADAMS’ VERSION. HOW DID I GAIN ‘SUPPORTERS’ THROUGH A BOOK REVIEW? HE IGNORES SIXTY MINUTES, NEVER MENTIONS THEM. NEVER MENTIONS THAT SHACKELFORD AND PLATZMAN POSTED WITH ME ON THE NEWSGROUP BECAUSE THEY WERE ALREADY MEMBERS.
However, due to many complications, critics, and online boos, she has had to postpone publication of her book until 2005.
THE TRUTH: I DECIDED NOT TO GET MY BOOK PUBLISHED BECAUSE OF DEATH THREATS. YES, MCADAMS’ GROUP ALSO BOO’D ME OUT OF THEIR NEWSGROUP. I STAYED FOR QUITE AWHILE, DEFENDING MYSELF AGAINST ALL THEIR CRITICISM. THOSE DEFENSES WERE ALMOST 100% ERASED!
NEXT MY COMPUTER, AND THE BOOK, WERE STOLEN FROM ME IN 2004 WHEN I WAS IN THE NETHERLANDS, AFTER THREATS FORCED ME OVERSEAS AFTER THE FILMING OF “THE LOVE AFFAIR” FOR THE HISTORY CHANNEL.
PORTIONS OF THE BOOK WERE SENT TO MCADAMS’ NEWSGROUP BY THE THIEVES AFTER I REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THEM; THEY WERE AFTER MY SCREENPLAY ABOUT “ME & LEE.” THEY DIDN’T GET IT.
DO NOT BELIEVE ANY ‘QUOTES’ FORM THE STOLEN BOOK, WHICH IS QUOTED BY MCADAMS AND OTHERS.

THE BOOK WAS THEN RE-PUBLISHED IN RESPONSE TO THE THIEVES’ BOGUS RELEASE BY JFK RESEARCHER AND WRITER HARRISON E.LIVINGSTONE, WITH THE HELP OF RESEARCHERS MARTIN SHACKELFORD AND DR. HOWARD PLATZMAN , BUT WITHOUT MY PERMISSION AND AUTHORIZATION, AS I WAS UNABLE TO SEE THE GALLEY PROOFS. LIVINGSTONE PUBLISHED IT ANYWAY. THIS IS AN UNAUTHORIZED RARE EDITION,(TRAFFORD PUBLICATION) WITH SOME FACTUAL AND TYPOGRAPHIC ERRORS, SUCH AS A WHOLE PARAGRAPH REPEATED ON ONE PAGE,THOUGH THE BASIC STORY REMAINED INTACT.
IN 2007, AFTER RENEWED DEATH THREATS, I WAS FORCED TO SEEK POLITICAL ASYLUM AFTER BEING WARNED IN HUNGARY, WHRRE I WAS TEACHING ENGLISH.
I WAS GIVEN EMPORARY REFUGE (NOBODY FROM THE USA CAN EVER GET POLITICAL ASYLUM IN THE EU—AMERICA IS NOT ON THE ‘DANGEROUS COUNTRY’ LISTS!). FOR OVER TEN MONTHS I WAS GIVEN SAFE HARBOR IN SWEDEN., UNTIL MY FAMILY AND FRIENDS COULD ARRANGE SAFE, REMOTE PLACES FOR ME TO LIVE. TODAY, I LIVE IN POVERTY BECAUSE I LOVE MY COUNTRY AND THE TRUTH.
IN 2008, I SENT THE 700 PAGE MANUSCRIPT TO TRINE DAY.
THE FULL BOOK HAD NEVER BEEN SEEN BY ANY PUBLISHER SINCE 2002, BUT TRINE DAY IMPRESSED ME BECAUSE THEY PRINT BOOKS SUCH AS A TERRIBLE MISTAKE, FLESHING OUT SKULL AND BONES AND OTHER IMPORTANT BOOKS EVERY GOOD AMERICAN SHOULD READ.
THE BOOK WAS DELAYED AS TRINE DAY MADE CERTAIN MY EVIDENCE WAS SOLID, ETC. THE
HARDBACK EDITION OF THE BOOK WAS PRINTED IN SEPTEMBER, 2010, WITH A FORWARD BY EDWARD T, HASLAM AND AN AFTERWORD BY JIM MARRS. THE PUBLISHER, KRIS MILLIGAN, ALSO WROTE A FINE INTRODUCTION. TRINE DAY PUBLISHING IS A COURAGEOUS, PATRIOTIC PRESS.

One year ago, she presented her story in a segment of the History Channel series "The Men Who Killed Kennedy."
THE TRUTH: THE MEN WHO KILLED KENNEDY, (TMWKK) WAS A LONG-RUNNING SERIES BY BRITISH FILM PRODUCER NIGEL TRNER, A REGULAR FEATURE ON THE HISTORY CHANNEL, SHOWN SEVERAL TIMES A YEAR AND ALWAYS IN NOVEMBER -- UNTIL 2003.
THAT’S WHEN ALL HELL BROKE LOOSE.

NIGEL TURNER HAD CONTRACTED WITH A&E TO ADD TWO MORE, FINAL SEGMENTS—WHEN HE WAS SENT TO INTERVIEW ME BY GERRY PATRICK HEMMING, A KNOWN AND RECOGNIZED FIGURE IN THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION SAGA. HEMMING KNEW I WAS TELLING THE TRUTH BECAUSE I’D GIVEN HIM INFORMATION LEE HAD TOLD ME ABOUT HIM THAT HAD NEVER BEEN PUBLISHED ANYWHERE.
THUS, A THIRD SEGMENT –THE ONE ABOUT ME & LEE –WAS ADDED AT TURNER'S REQUEST TO THE TWO PREVIOUSLY PLANNED SEGMENTS (“THE GUILTY MEN” AND “THE SMOKING GUNS”). IT WAS CALLED “THE LOVE AFFAIR.”
THE THREE NEW SEGMENTS WERE SOON PULLED OFF THE AIR, HOWEVER, WHEN HOWLS CAME FROM FORMER LBJ AIDES (JACK VALENTI AND BILL MOYERS), LBJ’S WIDOW AND HER FRIENDS, AND TWO FORMER PRESIDENTS (CARTER AND FORD).
THE THREE PULLED (AND DESTROYED) SEGMENTS BECAME FAMED IN THE TRUTH-TELLING UNDERGROUND AS THE "BANNED HISTORY CHANNEL DOCUMENTARIES.”
RECENTLY, YOUTUBE REMOVED THE PIRATED COPIES OF ALL THREE AFTER a&e COMPLAINED.
NOW YOU CAN ONLY ACCESS “THE LOVE AFFAIR” AT LEE-HARVEY-OSWALD.COM AND A FEW OTHER PLACES. NIGEL TURNER FILMED THAT THIRD SEGMENT—“THE LOVE AFFAIR” AS A STORY UNTO ITSELF—THE ONLY ONE IN THE SERIES ABOUT JUST ONE PERSON—MYSELF—DUE TO ALL THAT I WAS ABLE TO REVEAL ABOUT LEE OSWALD. FOR I REVEALED A LOT.
AFTER FULLY INVESTIGATING ME,AND MY EVIDENCE, AND EVEN THOUGH MY WITNESSES WERE INTIMIDATED AND BLOCKED FROM BEING SHOWN IN THE FILM, TURNER PRESENTED THE DOCUMENTARY TO THE HISTORY CHANNEL ANYWAY.
”THE LOVE AFFAIR” WAS SHOWN IN THE USA AND OVERSEAS, ACROSS EUROPE AND AUSTRALIA.
BUT IT WAS QUICKLY BANNED, ALONG WITH THE OTHER TWO SEGMENTS, FOR THEY IMPLICATED (RIGHTLY SO) THE COOPERATION OF LYNDON B. JOHNSON, THE POWER-HUNGRY VICE PRESIDENT, AND HIS COMPIANCE IN THE PLANS TO KILL KENNEDY. THOSE WHO DENY JOHNSON’S COMPLIANCE ARE SORELY MISTAKEN.
Only time will tell if she is accurate.
THE TRUTH: HOW? BY SPREADINGH LIES ABOUT ME? BY REMOVING MY DEFENSES FORM THE INTERNET AND LEAVING ONLY FALSEHOODS MIXED WITH HALF TRUTHS?
WITH INACCURATE STUFF LIKE THIS TRASHY BIOGRAPHY BEING FOISTED ON HE PEOPLE, HOW CAN THE PEOPLE LEARN THE TRUTH?

HOW CAN PEOPLE KNOW THE TRUTH WHEN INACCURATE FAIRYTALES, PRETENDING TO BE MY BIOGRAPHY, ARE BEING SPREAD ABOUT?
WHEN I COMPLAINED ABOUT THE CONTENT, WIKIPEDIA ERASED MY BIOGRAPHY, WHICH CARRIED MANY LINKS THAT COULD TELL YOU ABOUT WHERE TO FIND THE HARD FACTS AND THE TRUTH.
MEANWHILE, INDOPEDIA AND OTHER "ONLINE ENCYCLOPEDIAS” STILL CARRY THIS MANGLED VERSION OF MY LIFE, LIFTED FROM WIKIPEDIA. WIKIPEDIA STILL HAS A SMALL, LIBELOUS SMEAR PIECE ON ME UNDER THEIR ‘CONSPIRACY’ SECTION ABOUT THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION.
LITTLE OF WHAT WIKIPEDIA AND ITS MIRROR SITES HAVE WRITTEN ABOUT LEE HARVEY OSWALD AND THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION DESERVE MENTION AS TRUE HISTORY.
IT’S A TRAVESTY.

IT’S DOWN THE RABBIT HOLE.
IT’S THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS.
IT’S A MASS OF LIES.
THINK: WHY HAS THE GOVERNMENT SEALED SO MANY RECORDS ABOUT LEE OSWALD, DUE TO ‘NATIONAL SECURITY”? SO THE BAD GUYS WILL BE DEAD – AND CANNOT BE PUNISHED. OR, EVEN WORSE, ALL THE RECORDS WILL BE DESTROYED—ALTERED. AND ALL THE WITNESSES, SUCH AS I, WILL BE DEAD.
“TIME WILL TELL” ONLY WORKS IF THE TRUTH IS PRESERVED.
COPY THIS MONUMENT TO THE DESTRUCTION OF THE TRUTH, MASQUERADING AS A BIOGRAPHY, AND SHOW IT TO YOUR CHILDREN AS AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT CAN HAPPEN TO A PATRIOT WHO LOVES HER COUNTRY AND TRIED, AT ALL COSTS, TO GET THE TRUTH TO THE PEOPLE.
THEY WILL WAIT UNTIL WE ARE ALL DEAD.
“TIME WILL TELL”?
THE WINNERS WRITE THE HISTORY BOOKS, DON’T THEY?
GO TO WIM DANKBAAR'S JFKMURDERSLVED.COM AND CLICK ON "JFK II" TO SEE MORE OF THE TRUTH.
WHILE I HAVE BREATH, I WILL FIGHT FOR THE TRUTH.
HELP ME KEEP FIGHTING BY SPREADING THIS ARTICLE, AND OTHERS THAT I WRITE, TO EVERYONE YOU CAN. GET THE BOOKS I'VE MENTIONED. PRESERVE THE TRUTH FOR THE SAKE OF YOURSELVES AND YOUR COUNTRY.
YOU WILL THEN HAVE THE KEY TO WHO WAS BEHIND NINE-ELEVEN, AS WELL. AND WHY.
MEANWHILE, I AM BEING ERASED FROM THE INTERNET. MANY LIES ABOUT ME COME UP ON THE FIRST PAGES IN AN INTERNET SEARCH. ONLY BY COPYING MY BLOGS ELSEWHERE CAN THE WHOLE TRUTH BE KEPT ALIVE ON THE INTERNET.
YOU, TRULY, ARE THE HOPE FOR THE TRUTH IN OUR LIFETIME HAVING A CHANCE OF BEING PRESERVED.
AFTER I'M DEAD, AND OTHER WHISTLE-BLOWERS SUCH AS I ARE ALL DEAD, THEN THEY CAN WRITE WHAT THEY LIKE --AND YOU WILL BE TOLD TO SWALLOW IT.
THE AMAZING THING IS THAT THEY’RE DOING THIS WHILE I’M STILL ALIVE!
MY GOD!

PLEASE CONSIDER---IMAGINE THE LIES THEY HAVE TOLD ABOUT LEE HARVEY OSWALD, WHO WAS IMMEDIATELY KILLED!
OPEN YOUR EYES, AMERICA, BEFORE THE PEOPLE WHO TOOK OVER YOUR COUNTRY COMPLETELY DESTROY IT, ALL FOR THE SAKE OF MONEY AND POWER, NOT CARING WHO THEY TRAMPLE.
YOU COULD BE NEXT...

JVB

Saturday, August 28, 2010

"The Men Who Killed Kennedy and "The Love Affair" --Its Vanishing Playlist


Once again, the playlist for the banned History Channel documentary, THE LOVE AFFAIR,has vanished. After much searching, an avid supporter has found the five segments, though scattered, and has placed them in the correct order so they can be viewed in sequence (as they were originally before they were scattered).

Seg 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ry3DrsN9PY&feature=related
Seg 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRLDm7YT25w&feature=related
Seg 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBbe0jexWn4&feature=related
Seg 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGNyprupDTU&feature=related
Seg 5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZyJ1APE6Lc&feature=related

Along the same lines, over 230,000 references to my name have evaporated from the Internet. Yesterday another 100 vanished. When the level goes to 20,000 (it is now 20,200) I ask people to request google to restore the 'lost' references. Twice, it has then shot back up to over 26,000 this year. A far cry from quarter of a million, but hard to complain when Nigel turner, who once had 42,000 references, is now truncated on search engines to a mere 4,600, last I looked.

You find the exact number by placing "Judyth Vary Baker" in quotes before doing the name search, or "Nigel Turner" or "Lyndon Johnson," etc.

It is my hope that everyone reading this blog will make copies of the "playlist" and send it around. Censorship is a word that should not exist where humanity enjoys freedom of speech. Somebody tell that to those who are teaching our people that "conspiracy theory" is what anything involving Kennedy's death by any hand other than Oswald's should be called. We who tell the truth are supposed to be denounced, perhaps even fined, our groups infiltrated, disinformation spread about us.

several encyclopedias online have reproduced the now-erased inaccurate and nasty Wikipedia biography that has such choice gems in it as, I published several books, ran a number of businesses out of my university English teaching office, wrote a book called "From Dallas with Love" about Lee and me -- which never existed-- and worked for the Ochsner Clinic in 1972(!) -- the same year that somebody posed as "Judyth Vary Baker" to Ed Haslam in New Orleans. Because of this --God knows how I hated to ever have had to speak out, and waited many years -- but this must be corrected -- my authorized, official biography will be written and submitted to numerous sites within the next few days.
It is a fact that Oswald was innocent. The truth is overwhelming, despite the weight of Bugliosi's book, the weight of the 26 volumes, and the weight of the members of the Warren Commission (figuratively and physically). Against all those lies are many pieces of evidence, such as the tiny weight missing from the "Magic Bullet" versus to what was removed from Connally's shattered wrist, proving all by itself that other bullets were fired.
We now know for a certainty that the Zapruder film was drastically altered, thanks to "The Hollywood Seven" and Doug Horne's fine work, along with Dr. James Fetzer and his team of researchers (The Great Zapruder Film Hoax).


-----------------------
The indefatigable Ed Haslam, and those other great Americans who have battled to protect the truth from extinction are our true American heroes. One look at what America has become since 1963 shows what happens when a conspiracy removes a legally elected sitting American President.
(I'm not sure Bush-Shrub was legally elected -- are you?)
From that pivotal event in Dallas came the first President to resign from office, the first president APPOINTED to the office, a vice president's resignation for corruption, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, the Afghanistan War, the war in Iraq (What next, Iran?). Not to mention rampant greed, corruption, etc. that is both ungodly and ubiquitous. Exhausted American families are being ripped apart by those who want to get the last drop of sweat and toil and energy from them.
Sweden's people get five weeks of paid vacation.
My friend who just came to visit me said he could not get ANY vacation the first year he worked as a security guard. The next year --one week.
My God! In the 1960's, we talked of 30 hour work weeks.
The American Dream is a nightmare of overwork, homeless, drugs, debt, poor diet and bankruptcy as any health problem can wipe out a lifetime of savings (I know!).
How is it that banks can be saved, with billions of dollars, but good, hard-working American families are turned out of their homes because they can't pay the banks due to the horrendous unemployment situation and what I will call the Great Depression of 2008? A freeze should be placed on all house payments for one year. Know what? That would save us. Instead, the banks got the money, but the people still had to pay the banks...a double-stuffed Oreo Cookie treat if I ever saw one -- but for the banks, not the people.
Student loans should be cancelled to give everybody a fresh start.
Do you consider that an outrageous idea?
Kids graduate with enormous debts to repay--and can't get a job! They default or defer their loans. I have spoken to many despairing students who have simply given up ever being able to repay their skyrocketing student loans--they deferred them a couple of years because they had no jobs.
Our poor kids have mortgaged their lives and their futures to the banks.
Who can afford to become a doctor?
Where are the dreams of all qualified students getting their chance to go to college?
Nor can I, who have a folder full of inventions, several of them medical inventions, turn any of them into reality, because the costs of development and patenting are so high. I will cheerfully donate my inventions in the medical field to anyone capable of turning them into reality. One is to prevent the formation of bedsores.
I've tried for two years to give the invention to someone capable of developing it.
Free.
Because I want to help people.
No takers.
Nobody can afford to do the patent search, pay for a patent, etc. Certainly not me.
Inventing something in America is easy.
Getting it to the people these days is extremely difficult.
Ford, Goodyear, Edison--they'd be helpless in today's milieu.
As for "American" (Industrial Complex) interventions and preemptive wars, where our precious young men and women die, supposedly to save us from terrorists, while, instead, we make good Muslims hate our guts, why don't we intervene in the situation in Darfur? Or Somalia? I'll tell you why: it's called a lust for money, oil, and power, an unquenchable greed, a deep and enduring case of corruption, that has nothing to do with preserving our freedom, but everything to do with making money.
You know it.
I know it.
It's a sad fact that doors are closing.
Doors of hope.
Doors of opportunity.
Our kids are having to leave America in order to make a decent new life for themselves.
...I was dismayed to see that the US ranks 47th (2009 statistics) in terms of longevity, with Bosnia, Puerto Rico and Jordan ranked higher.
(Ref: http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/hea_lif_exp_at_bir_tot_pop-life-expectancy-birth-total-population)
Sweden ranks #10, but only because so many crippled and wounded refugees from Iran, Iraq, Somalia, etc. swarm into that tiny country: without political asylum seekers (10% of Sweden's population is foreign-born) that country would rank right up there with Macao, Andorra, Japan, and its neighboring Scandinavian countries.
John F. Kennedy said that we must not ask what our country can do for us, but what can we do for our country.
The Number One thing we can do for our country is to care about the truth.

I have had the privilege of welcoming a young visitor from America. Fairly well-educated, he typifies the condition of so many young Americans: decent jobs are overseas, so he has come overseas in an attempt to survive this economic crisis.
He learned his history from the state-approved textbooks and the AP history courses. What he learned was slight, often wrong, and made little impression. He thought the "black panthers" killed Martin Luther King!
He thought Iraqi terrorists brought down the twin towers. He was told that in school!
And because the History Channel's "Conspiracy Theorists" online video described me as claiming to have "invented AIDS"-- HE ASKED ME IF I HAD DONE SO!
I told him the truth and lamented the fact that nobody at the History Channel, who slammed me, Jim Marrs, and Edward Haslam--while at the same time making Jim Garrison look like a dunce, mentioning one of Garrison's odd, earlier ideas about the nature of the conspiracy that killed Kennedy, while ignoring his later, more accurate assessments ---I told him, I repeat, I told this young man that nobody at the History Channel ever asked me, before making their defamatory and libelous and even dangerous statements about me --- I repeat a third time--not one of them ever, at any time, met me, or spoke to me, to verify their outrageous claims before presenting them to who knows how many thousands of viewers.
The book Me & Lee: How I Came to Know, Love and Lose Lee Harvey Oswald-- will soon be released.
To you.
It is a book the History Channel does not want you or anybody else to read.
They want you to read the big book they praise for its size -- written by Bugliosi--a man who never met me, either, yet offered plenty of insults about me-- they want you to believe the Warren Commission, where the enemies of JFK were called together by Lyndon Johnson --including Dulles of the CIA who had been fired by Kennedy. From the beginning, the evidence was handled by the FBI and the CIA, with the Mayor of Dallas--Cabell--overwatching (his brother, a fine general, was also fired by Kennedy).
The truth can stand the test of time only if the truth is known.
Help me keep the truth alive.
I do need your help to spread the word.
Only with your help will I dare return to a beloved country.
Meanwhile, every day I will pick up a bottle of brown dirt and look at it--it is soil from the state of Texas, where it all happened. Sent to me by a researcher I respect, it is more important to me than anything else I have here in exile.
That soil comes from where all five of my children were born.
That soil comes from where the man I loved more than anything in the world was gunned down before my eyes, as I watched on TV -- accused, though he had courageously tried to save Kennedy, of Kennedy's murder, by the very people who orchestrated Kennedy's death.
That soil, which comes from where I wish I could have had a horse (once helped save 37 starving horses near Houston....).
Where dear and precious family and friends live...
The land of the free and the home of the brave...
My America.
Under seige.
Don't let the Truth die!
Help me.


Judyth Vary Baker

Friday, July 2, 2010



“Investigations: Between Two Fires” – Time Magazine’s
Valentine’s Day Massacre of Lee Harvey Oswald’s Character
as an Example of Bias in Media

by Judyth Vary Baker



INTRODUCTION

On Valentine’s Day in 1929, Al Capone’s gang had two men dress up as policemen. They entered a garage, and lined up six mobsters and a doctor from a rival crime syndicate facing a wall. Two men in ordinary clothes entered the garage and opened fire, massacring the men facing the wall. Witnesses outside the garage heard gunfire, but felt safe when they saw two policemen leaving the scene of the crime with the two gunmen walking ahead of them, their hands raised in the air. To the outside world, the police had done their job. But what the witnesses saw was the use of “the law” to get away with murder.
(Ref: “St. Valentine’s Day Massacre…” www.mysterynet.com/vdaymassacre/ )
It is now believed that “the law” and uniformed police were also used in another famous incident – the arrest and condemnation of Lee Harvey Oswald, accused of killing President Kennedy mere minutes after his arrest. According to the Dallas Police department arrest record, Oswald was immediately charged with the murders of Kennedy and Tippitt. He was also charged with wounding Governor Connelly.
Pg. 179 of the Warren Report states “At 1:51 p.m., police car 2 reported by radio that it was on the way to headquarters with the suspect.” Oswald was arrested a few minutes prior to that report – no earlier than 1:45. But the arrest report was made out with the time of arrest shown as 1:40PM, even though police weren’t called to the scene until 1:45 according to the Warren Commission and Dallas Police radio records.




What is disturbing is that the arrest report shows the arrest was made at 1:40 PM. But it wasn’t until 1:45 p.m. that the police arrived at the Texas Theater, according to p. 143 of the Warren Commission Report. Between the Dallas Police and the Warren Commission, we find an abundance of such discrepancies. This was the investigation of the death of President Kennedy, and we cannot find them with the same data.
A blatant example of manipulated information and evidence by the Dallas Police is summarized by the saga of the bullets and their casings as described by the Dallas Police, versus what the FBI laboratories reported.

The Bullets and Officer Tippit: an Example of Bias at the Basic Level
In a footnote to an article titled “Lee Harvey Oswald’s “Murder” of Policeman JD Tippit,” (REF: http://scribblguy.50megs.com/tippit.htm), the reader is encouraged to


learn the difference between a regular revolver and an automatic hand gun in order to realize how Lee Oswald was framed:
To appreciate the injustice described here, it is necessary to understand the difference between an automatic hand gun and a revolver. An automatic contains the bullets in a clip, which fits inside its [large, fat] handle. Each time the gun is fired, the empty cartridge remaining in the chamber is automatically flipped out by the ejector mechanism… [and] the new cartridge and bullet are pushed up into place by a spring at the bottom of the clip… each time the automatic flips out a used cartridge it leaves on it an ineradicable mark of the ejector mechanism….A revolver…[ has a smaller gripping handle] and holds its cartridges and bullets in a circular, revolving chamber and does not automatically eject each cartridge as fired…A revolver…leaves only the mark of the firing pin. “
The article quotes from New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison’s book, On the Trail of the Assassins. Garrison, who was also a former FBI agent, is the featured character in the much-maligned Oliver Stone movie, JFK, which over the years has proven to be closer to the truth than its critics want you to believe. A big Internet website spends pages and pages telling the reader that Oliver Stone’s film, which is not a documentary, isn’t an accurate documentary. Duh! Here’s what the real Jim Garrison had to say about the bullets in the Tippit murder case (bold face mine):
…I discovered that beyond the eyewitnesses there was other evidence gathered and altered by the Dallas homicide unit showing that Lee Oswald had been framed in the Tippit murder.
For instance…Just minutes after a citizen first reported the murder on Tippit's radio. Patrolman H.W. Summers in Dallas police unit number 221 (the designation for the squad car) reported that an "eyeball witness to the getaway man" had been located. The suspect was described as having black wavy hair, wearing an Eisenhower jacket of light color, with dark trousers and a white shirt. He was "apparently armed with a .32, dark finish, automatic pistol," which he had in his right hand. Moments later, Sergeant G. Hill reported that "the shell at the scene indicates that the suspect is armed with an automatic .38 rather than a pistol."



It seemed clear to me from this that the hand gun used to shoot Tippit was an automatic. But the gun allegedly taken from Lee Oswald when Dallas police later arrested him at the Texas Theatre was a revolver. Unless Oswald had stopped and changed guns, which no one had ever suggested, this fact alone put a severe hole in the government's case.
The bullets found in Officer Tippit's body and the cartridges found at the scene of his murder yielded further evidence of the frame-up. The Dallas coroner had conducted an autopsy on Tippit's body and had removed four bullets from it. Three of them, it turned out, were copper-coated and had been manufactured by the Winchester Western company. The fourth, however, was a lead bullet made by the Remington-Peters company
This was awfully strange… bullets were never sold in mixed lots. Gun users bought either a box of all Winchesters or one of all Remingtons, but not some of each. The discovery of two different makes of bullets in Tippit's body indicated to me and would indicate to most experienced police officers a likelihood that two different gunmen did the shooting. This was consistent with the eyewitness testimony of Acquilla Clemons and Mr. and Mrs. Wright.
When a homicide occurs…the police homicide division [sends]…the bullets and cartridges to the F.B.I. Iaboratory in Washington, D.C. for study and possible identification of the gun that fired them. In this case, the Dallas homicide unit,…sent only one bullet to the F.B.I. Iab, informing the Bureau that this was the only bullet found in Tippit's body.
To everyone's surprise, the Bureau lab found that the bullet did not match Oswald's revolver. When it discovered this oddity, the Warren Commission…[looked] for other bullets that might match up better. Although the Commission never received a copy of Tippit's autopsy report, somehow it found out that four bullets rather than merely one had been found in Tippit's body. The ordinarily incurious Commission asked the F.B.I. to inquire about the three missing


bullets, and they were found after four months gathering dust in the files of the Dallas homicide division. These bullets were sent to the F.B.I. Iab. But Special Agent Courtlandt Cunningham, the ballistics expert from the lab, testified before the Commission that the lab was unable to conclude that any of the four bullets found in Tippit's body had been fired by the revolver taken from Lee Oswald.
The cartridges allegedly found at the scene proved even more problematic. While the bullets had initially been under the control of the coroner who found them in Tippit's body, the cartridges, the metal casings which provide propulsion power to the bullets, were Dallas homicide's responsibility from the outset.
On the very day of Officer Tippit's murder, Dallas homicide had made a summary of all the evidence it had in the case, a most important standard police procedure. Although a number of witnesses mentioned that they had seen cartridges strewn around after the shooting and the early recorded radio messages had described the murder weapon as an automatic because of the ejector marks on cartridges found at the scene, this summary did not include cartridges of any kind.
It was not until six days after it had sent the single bullet to the F.B.I. Iab in Washington that the Dallas homicide division finally added four cartridges allegedly found at the scene to the Tippit evidence summary. The cartridges were then sent off to Washington, and the Bureau lab promptly reported back that they indeed had been fired by the same revolver that Oswald allegedly purchased through the mail under the alias of A. Hidell….[but] the late appearance of the cartridges only focused more attention on the Dallas homicide unit's unconscionable manipulation of evidence.
I knew that if the cartridges had actually been fired by Oswald before his arrest, they routinely would have been included in the summary of evidence and sent off to the F.B.l. Iab on the evening of the murder. But these cartridges were not sent until well *after* Dallas homicide had learned that the lab could not find positive markings from Oswald's gun on the single bullet. (This evaluation would have come from the Washington lab to the Dallas Bureau office by telex within 24 hours.)

It seemed clear to me what had happened. Having failed to get a positive identification with Oswald's revolver from the bullet, Dallas homicide was not about to send off cartridges with an automatic hand gun's ejector marks on them, even if these were the actual cartridges found at the scene. Instead, someone in the homicide division or cooperating with it had fired the confiscated revolver *after* Oswald's arrest, thereby obtaining the needed cartridges bearing its imprint. Then those cartridges were sent to Washington.
However, competence was not the Dallas homicide unit's strong suit, even in fabricating evidence. The F.B.I. Iab found that *two* of the cartridge cases had been manufactured by Western and *two* by Remington. Since the lab had already concluded that *three* of the bullets found in Tippit's body were copper-coated Westerns and *one* was a lead Remington, these numbers simply did not add up.
Worse yet, at the Warren Commission hearings it became embarrassingly apparent that the used cartridges that the Dallas homicide team had sent to the F. B.l. Iab were not the cartridges actually found at the scene of Tippit's murder. One witness, Domingo Benavides, found two used cartridge shells not far from the shooting and handed them to Officer J.M. Poe. Dallas Police Sergeant Gerald Hill instructed Poe to mark them i.e., to scratch his initials on them in order to maintain the chain of evidence. This is standard operating procedure for all homicide officers everywhere.
Poe informed the Warren Commission that he believed he had marked them, but he could not swear to it. At the Commission hearing Poe examined four cartridges that were shown to him but was unable to identify his marks on them. Sergeant W.E. Barnes informed the Commission that he had received two cartridges from Officer Poe back at police headquarters and had added his own initials to them. However, he too was unable to positively identify the two shells.

No wonder Jim Garrison, a former FBI man, tried to solve the murder by indicting Clay Shaw Dr. Alton Ochsner, a longtime close friend of Shaw’s, as stated in Surgeon of the South, his official biography, feared he would be arrested, too. We now know that tremendous efforts were made using the media to discredit Garrison’s investigation. Not only newspapers and magazines, but even TV and radio programs united in criticizing Garrison. A close look at emerging evidence since 2000 indicates that the government actively influenced the media in these efforts, but this is another story to look at later.
Evidence has also emerged that Officer Tippit may have been shot for private reasons unconnected to Oswald, but it gave an excuse to bring many police into the same area – Oak Cliff -- where Lee Oswald was. The fact that Dallas police first sought their suspect in the nearby public library (Oswald’s favorite after-work haunt) indicates that police had been tipped off where to look for him.
It should be evident by now that Oswald was framed, though we have offered but a single example -- additional instances are also on record.
Erroneous information in this highly political case reached not only the media, but also the Warren Commission. It was announced that “without a doubt,” Oswald had murdered Tippit. The media lapped it up.
One should ask, why was Oswald being set up for Tippit’s murder? The answer might be that the Dallas Police would be more likely to kill the suspect when he was apprehended. Oswald probably saved himself from getting shot on the spot in the Texas Theater by shouting, “I am not resisting arrest!” and “Police brutality!”
The police might also have been more willing to cooperate with directives to plant evidence against Lee Oswald if they were convinced that he shot one of their own. Any mistreatment of Oswald by police would be excusable because of his “cold-blooded murder” of Tippit.

The Government and Police Were Initially in Charge of Information Release

Information the first few days of the assassination was doled out to the press and media through the FBI, the CIA, the Dallas Police, and the District Attorney. Only later, when independent interviews and investigations of those events could be made can we lay blame on media, saying it was biased in its reportage.
On top of that, we must remember the deep impact of this tragic event on everyone. The President had been murdered, but police were being lauded because his supposed killer had been arrested quickly. But then the accused assassin was suddenly gunned down. It was that shocking event that created question marks: in Europe, as many of my friends here have reminded me, there was little doubt that Oswald was the patsy he said he was. The violent elimination of accused assassins was something Europeans had seen before. In general, Europeans never bought into the Official Version. By January,


1964, Lord Bertrand Russell had launched a committee to try to look into the murky depths of the matter. The committee’s findings would be ignored in America. For Americans still trusted their government (it wouldn’t last much longer).

When Dallas District Attorney Henry Wade told reporters that there was no doubt that Oswald had killed both Kennedy and Tippit, he was generally believed.



---------------------------------------------------------------

Reporter: "Did you shoot the President?"Oswald: "I did not shoot anybody, no sir."
The PSE chart of Oswald's statement reveals no stress. Lie detection experts have confirmed that Oswald was telling the truth. Ref: The Assassination Tapes: An electronic probe into the Murder of John F. Kennedy and the Dallas cover-up, George O'Toole, Penthouse Press Ltd., New York, 1975. This voice-stress analysis printout shows Lee Harvey Oswald was innocent. Such tests are more reliable than polygraphs.


Lee Oswald was also denied legal counsel. This shameful denial of the prisoner’s rights occurred despite the fact that Oswald spoke directly to reporters saying, “I do request – -that someone to come forward -- to give me – legal assistance.” On YouTube and elsewhere, that plea for help, and two others, can be seen on film: “…they have given me a hearing without legal representation or anything,” he first stated, and, “I’d like some legal representation,” he said later, “…these police officers have not allowed me to have any…”
But nobody stepped forward. ACLU lawyers later said they were turned away. Oswald’s request for legal assistance was buried with him by the police.
Soon after the accused assassin was killed by mobster Jack Ruby, Dallas police authorities told the media that Oswald had refused a lawyer when he was arraigned. That’s how fast the truth was altered. Researcher Gil Jesus spoke on Black Op Radio on Nov. 1, 2009, listing the incidents where Oswald supposedly refused counsel, in contradiction to the testimony of witnesses. Read the text and see the citations at my blog:
(Ref: http://oswald-not-guilty.blogspot.com/2009/11/lee-harvey-oswald-was-not-allowed-to.html )

Attorney Mark Lane, urged by Oswald’s mother, Marguerite Oswald to take the case, came to Lee’s defense after Oswald was buried. Lane’s “Lawyer’s Brief,” an eight-page “tabloid-sized pamphlet,” soon followed. It was printed by The National Guardian in its December 19, 1963 edition, addressing potent problems with fifteen statements given to the media by Henry Wade, District Attorney for Dallas as evidence of Oswald’s guilt. Though all fifteen statements had problems with honesty or with the reliability of the evidence, which Lane points out – and which has been substantiated through the years, to their shame, the Warren Commission and Oswald-did-it Internet websites still quote from this dismal litany of false accusations.
Lane’s “Lawyer’s brief,” as posted on the Internet, is a valuable introduction to media bias to anyone seeking the truth about the assassination. Most of Lane’s points remain patent today, and many additional difficulties with the case have emerged, along with fresh evidence backing up Lane’s initial observations.
A careful study shows that if damning evidence, reported by the media, turned out to be false, the public was likely not to be told.. Mark Lane addressed an instance of this tendency in his “Point Fifteen”:
Point Fifteen
“A map was found in Oswald’s possession showing the scene of the assassination and the bullet’s trajectory.
THE DAY AFTER Wade’s historic press conference, and three days after the Oswald arrest, a new discovery was made.
“Today Mr. Wade announced that authorities had also found a marked map, showing the course of the President’s motorcade, in Oswald’s rented room. ‘It was a map tracing the location of the parade route,’ the district attorney said, ‘and this place [the Texas School Book Depository, a warehouse from which the fatal shots were fired] was marked with a straight line.’ Mr. Wade said Oswald had marked the map at two other places, ‘apparently places which he considered a possibility for an assassination.’” (New York Times, Nov. 25.)

A document written by the defendant showing his intention to commit a crime is important evidence. It seems incredible, were such a map in the hands of the Dallas authorities on the previous day when Wade presented the evidence, “piece by piece,” that he would have neglected to mention it.

Oswald was arrested three days prior to the map announcement. On the day of his arrest police removed all of his belongings from his room, telling the landlady that Oswald “would not return.” One wonders where the map came from three days later. The same newspapers that hailed the discovery of the map Nov. 25, without a single question as to its legitimacy, origin. or previous whereabouts, totally ignored or buried the last comment regarding this important document. “Dallas officials yesterday denied that such a map exists.” (Washington Post, Nov. 27.)”

By then, the media had labeled Lee H. Oswald as “the sole assassin,” just as the Hoover-inspired Katzenbach memo had wanted:



A SWIFT VERDICT OF GUILTY—N.Y. TIMES HEADLINE NOV. 25
The Times later 'regretted' its failure to qualify the word assassin

The Oswald-did-it headline appeared about the same time the notorious memo from the FBI (the Katzenbach memo, written to Bill Moyers) was circulating, reflecting J. Edgar Hoover’s order to “convince the public” that Oswald was a lone assassin, and that nobody else was involved; “the wrong kind” of investigations were to be quashed, and the public was to be left with no doubts about the matter.
The National Guardian complained about the general bias against Oswald in the United States, evident when Lane’s “Brief “was largely ignored by US media:

“New readers will be interested in the reaction to the publication of the Lane brief. The press reaction was interesting. Except for the Times, no New York newspaper printed a line on the Lane brief. The United Press International got proof sheets in advance and announced it “wouldn’t touch it.” The Associated Press was offered the proofs, but said it was not interested; after the Times story appeared, AP became interested.

Abroad the reaction was quite different. In Rome the Lane brief was scheduled to be printed in full in Paese Sera, the largest in the evening field, and in Liberation in Paris. Oggi, an Italian magazine with a circulation of one million, sought permission to reprint. The Japanese press and news agencies also were on top of the story. Several Mexican papers picked it up, too.”

How could the public doubt that Lee Harvey Oswald was a deranged misfit, a communist, a friendless, smirking malcontent? With an abundance of evidence proving his guilt, mothers stopped naming their children “Lee.” Lee Harvey Oswald had the most hated name in the 1960’s by the time the media was finished with him. Everything stated above can be verified through official records and witness testimony, and has been repeated here only for the uninformed. Though the myth that Oswald killed Kennedy is still propagated on websites (by people who know better), concerned people who have delved into the matter realize that Oswald was framed to hide a complex coup d’etat.

While the Internet provides the intelligent reader and researcher abundant information proving that Oswald was innocent, recently some very old screeds against Oswald have been trotted out. Since these articles were written in 1963-1969, they may be regarded by the unsuspecting public as, thereby, more accurate than material written some five decades later.
But that depends on who wrote them.

“INVESTIGATIONS BETWEEN TWO FIRES”

Criticize Time, Life or other major media outlets at your peril. It can make or break a book, a reputation, a human life. Major media shape public opinion. This was also true in the 1960’s.
Getting Life Magazine and Time Magazine – trusted media resources --to write nasty things about the accused assassin was no hard task. Life had already purchased the Zapruder film that we now know was deeply doctored, even to the point of painting the back of Kennedy’s head black. Life also ‘accidently” printed some frames of the
film backwards, trying to reduce the suggestion in the few frames shown that Kennedy had been thrown violently backwards due to a shot from the front (Oswald’s building was located behind the Presidential limo). (Then) New Orleans reporter Dan Rather helpfully stated that he saw the film (before it was locked up) , and described its contents for all Americans, telling everyone that Kennedy’s head was thrusr forward “with considerable violence,” clearly indicating that Kennedy had been shot from behind. The veteran researcher Penn Jones took Rather to task for his duplicity, which was not limited to what he “saw’ in the Zapruder film:

“But the biggest distortion is what he said he saw when he was one of the few persons in the world privileged to see the Abraham Zapruder film that Saturday morning, November 23. In his narration of the film as part of CBS nationwide television coverage, Rather said the President's head "went forward with considerable violence." This narration confirmed the so-called "Oswald position" for the nation, but he said nothing about the violent backward motion of the President's head which would have strongly suggested a second gunman at that early date.
Actually the President's head went forward for about three inches and then was slammed to the left rear--not consistent with a shot being fired from the "Oswald position" from behind President Kennedy.

[Rather’s] book says this about the incident:
"…Years later, a group of assassination buffs took an audio tape of my description of what I saw in the office of Zapruder's lawyer and laid it over the film as a narration. So the impression was given that Dan Rather was part of a conspiracy. Either that or he was a Communist dupe, or something, how else could he have seen the film, etc. etc."
No one that I know ever thought Rather was a Communist dupe. All I wanted Rather to do was admit his error to the television audience he had misinformed. Grudgingly, he admits the error in his book, but that is not the same as saying so on CBS evening news. “


Penn Jones, Jr., who laid Rather’s narration as a sound track with he Zapruder film, kindly calls Rather’s description “an error,” but I cannot be so kind. Notice that Rather uses the term “assassination buffs” in his excuses for his unconscionable quotation. This is the sleazy term that is also used by Official Version Internet websites notorious for their bias. The biggest “Oswald-did-it” websites typically use the same term to cast aspersions on honest researchers in the case -- researchers who have spent time, money and effort as patriotic citizens to do the job the U.S. government failed to do.

One would never call persons investigating the 2010 BP oil spill disaster, “oil spill buffs.”

As one writer observed, would we call those investigating the Holocaust “holocaust buffs”? The preferred term used today is “conspiracy theorists,” -- as if conspiracies have never occurred, except in theory.

Readers should be aware that there are government officials out there who have recommended a crackdown on “conspiracy theorists,” using the media as its chief weapon:

----------------------------------------
Top Obama Czar: Infiltrate all 'conspiracy theorists'
Presidential adviser wrote about crackdown on expressing opinions

________________________________________
Posted: January 14, 2010 12:30 am Eastern By Aaron Klein WorldNetDaily

In a lengthy academic paper, President Obama's regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, argued the U.S. government should ban "conspiracy theorizing."
…Sunstein…recommended the government send agents to infiltrate "extremists who supply conspiracy theories" to disrupt the efforts of the "extremists" to propagate their theories.
In a 2008 Harvard law paper, "Conspiracy Theories," Sunstein and co-author Adrian Vermeule, a Harvard law professor, ask, "What can government do about conspiracy theories?"
"We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories."

In the 30-page paper – obtained and reviewed by WND – Sunstein argues the best government response to "conspiracy theories" is "cognitive infiltration of extremist groups."


Continued Sunstein: "We suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories: cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories…Sunstein said government agents "might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action."
Sunstein defined a conspiracy theory as "an effort to explain some event or practice by reference to the machinations of powerful people, who have also managed to conceal their role."
Some "conspiracy theories" recommended for ban by Sunstein include…"The view that the Central Intelligence Agency was responsible for the assassination of President John F. Kennedy."…"The Trilateral Commission is responsible for important movements of the international economy." …"That Martin Luther King Jr. was killed by federal agents."…The moon landing was staged and never actually occurred."
Sunstein allowed that "some conspiracy theories, under our definition, have turned out to be true."
He continued: "The Watergate hotel room used by Democratic National Committee was, in fact, bugged by Republican officials, operating at the behest of the White House. In the 1950s, the CIA did, in fact, administer LSD and related drugs under Project MKULTRA, in an effort to investigate the possibility of 'mind control.'”
…WND reported that in a recently released book, "On Rumors," Sunstein argued websites should be obliged to remove "false rumors" while libel laws should be altered to make it easier to sue for spreading such "rumors." ....Sunstein compared the need for the government to regulate broadcasting to the moral obligation the U.S. had to impose new rules that outlawed segregation…”

----------------------------


The media admittedly has problems reporting controversial news material: it isn’t fun or profitable to be banned from a White House press conference for happening to write a less popular opinion. Efforts to conscientiously and accurately report controversial events are impeded by government influences, as exemplified by Dan Rather’s less-than-honest description of the long-hidden Zapruder film. We basically have the much-maligned Jim Garrison to thank for bringing that film before the public at last, with Robert Groden as the projectionist at the Clay Shaw trial, the main topics of Oliver Stone’s film, JFK. The projectionist was inspired to do a bit more:

“In 1975, Robert Groden and Dick Gregory secured access to a copy of the film and showed it on ABC television. Groden’s version was enhanced—it was a sharper version that was slowed down. Therefore, its impact was even stronger than the version shown in New Orleans. Now, without the media to neuter the reaction, the public was allowed to see the film for the first time. The reaction was nothing less than sensational. It was one of the major reasons why the House Select Committee [HSCA] was created the next year.
…After over two decades, the Review Board has now tried to revert the film back to its proper owners: the citizenry of this country. Who knows what would have happened if this film would have been shown on national television in 1963? Would the Warren Commission have been able to complete their whitewash? After all, in 1969 the film helped convince a jury that Kennedy had been killed as a result of a conspiracy.”
Frequently, to their shame, many TV showings of the Zapruder film cut out part of the film where Kennedy’s head is shown exploding as if it were a melon as the President is thrown violently “back, and to the left.” The usual excuse is that the scene is in poor taste.

I call it censorship by the media, and you should, too.

In June, 2010, the City of Dallas arrested “vendors” (people selling souvenirs and books, as well as tour guides) at Dealey Plaza, among them that same paragon of research, Robert Groden, who along with other “vendors” has been educating the public about the truth for decades. Groden was arrested for “not having a permit” to sell his books there -- but the City of Dallas would not give him a permit (such do not exist, but the statute under which Groden was arrested specifies that a permit must be obtained, nevertheless – a handy Catch-22). Groden filed suit early in July, 2010 against the City of Dallas for curtailing his civil rights. The City of Dallas wants no dissenting voices on the sidewalks overlooking the site of Kennedy’s murder. They want everyone to go to the Sixth Floor Museum, where Groden’s books –and any other books by “conspiracy theorists” – such as Jim Marrs’ Crossfire, or James Douglass’ JKF and the Unspeakable, or Edward T. Haslam’s Dr. Mary’s Monkey -- are banned.

What you’ll find for sale at the Museum will be the “Oswald-did-it” official version staples. The general belief is that Dealey Plaza is being cleared out in anticipation of the 50th anniversary. There has been talk that Dealey Plaza will be sealed off and admission will be charged to all who wish to visit the site in 2013. A tradition will die if the City gets its way. Imagine having to pay admission to Arlington cemetery, or to the Lincoln Memorial! Dallas, sometimes called “the City of Hate” has only one noticeable memorial to John F. Kennedy – the Sixth Floor Museum that charges a fee for entry and offers only the Official Version to its captive audience.

Censorship by silence is the most prevalent form of media bias. How many people were told in November, 2009, that post-production film CEO Sydney Wilkinson’s “Hollywood Seven” discovered that the back of Kennedy’s head had been painted black, hiding a shot from the front, on the Zapruder film? Read about it in Doug Horne’s Inside the ARRB.

However, if something can be concocted that might implicate Oswald, it’s sure to get attention. Example: a highly flawed study of one of the infamous ‘backyard photos” was widely publicized. The Dartmouth professor who stated that the photo he studied showed that the backyard photos were “genuine” turned out to have his research in digital photography analysis funded by the CIA. And it turned out he never analalyzed an original photo –just a digitalized copy of it. His finding that he found nothing wrong with the digitalized copy is rather like painting a potato green and then declaring that the paint was green. His analysis had nothing to do with the original photo. But you’d never know that from the reaction by the media.

To this day, the Dartmouth professor’s highly flawed analysis of his digital copy (of what seems to be a mere digital copy of a copy!) of the photo is dotted all over the Internet and was in all the newspapers. To best comprehend why the study was as fake as the photo Professor Farid studied, go to the Internet and read articles by Dr. James Fetzer and Jim Marrs, by Dr. Fetzer, and by myself, published by Op-Ed News and on our blogs on the Internet. Below is a paragraph from the Op Ed article by Fetzer and Marrs
mentioning my own observations about Farid’s work:


The professor could have learned much more had he only conducted a search of the literature. Even YouTube includes this documentary, FAKE: The Forged Photograph that Framed Lee Harvey Oswald. One of the most interesting has been posted by Judyth Vary Baker, whom we believe to be who she claims -- a cancer researcher who became acquainted with Oswald in New Orleans.
In her study, she notes that digitizing a backyard photo creates a problem of trustworthiness, where the strongest conclusion he is justified in drawing is that the pixels in the copy of a copy of a copy he analyzed were not tampered with. He simply reconstructed portions of a backyard photo -- we do not know which one he chose -- but only seems to have reconstructed the head and neck, not a full figure corresponding to the image.
The media never questioned the authenticity of Farid’s work: the newspapers lapped it up. They do the same thing every November, when well-funded “specials’ bring forth the latest attempt to “prove” “Oswald did it.”

Why We Should Examine This Old Article about Oswald

People were snapping up stories about “the assassin” after Oswald was murdered by Jack Ruby – itself a suspicious event. The more sensational, the better. The guilt of Oswald was accepted as a ‘given’ by most popular media outlets. It was difficult to write a piece in true perspective after the FBI announced in December that Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole assassin. Proving that he was capable of such a deed seemed easy.

The Valentine’s Day massacre of Lee Harvey Oswald’s reputation by Time Magazine is the centerpiece of “Investigations Between Two Fires” -- so named because that’s how Marina Oswald identified herself, trapped between deportation fears and interrogations. In its Feb. 14, 1964 article, Time added its own prestigious name to the disgraceful avalanche of media lies concerning Oswald.

The article you are reading has become necessary to provide balance for the impression the 1964 article can make on the uninformed and the naïve, including the new generation that has risen that knows nothing of the saga of misinformation that has plagued the reconstruction of the Kennedy assassination.

The Valentine’s Day article appears high on Google if a search for “Lee Harvey Oswald” is made. Official Version websites, including a highly biased Wikipedia


biography, distort the truth, often by using quotations derived from the Dallas police and early media stories based on what the police and the FBI told them. The article serves as ian excellent example of how the media cooperated in the framing of a man presumed guilty without a trial. The article’s quotations are still used today, exemplifying how old lies can be used to push an official agenda.

“Investigations Between Two Fires” – Time Magazine’s oft-quoted contribution to the vilification of Oswald – tells readers about his half-crazy mother, his bamboozled Russian wife, and his cold-blooded ways. It seem natural that such a man could soot Kennedy on nothing more than a whim. The article goes far to convince the ill-informed reader that Oswald, without any friends or co-conspirators, did the job all by himself. The magazine presented its own modified version of Oswald’s life, crafted to help the public hate the man who had cried out, “I’m just a patsy!”

After a description of Oswald’s youth that focused mostly on the negative, his mother was brought center-stage for a good drubbing. Marguerite Oswald was a proud, obdurate, opinionated woman. She was easy to caricature:
“The Mother. Marina Oswald was the first witness to appear before the Warren Commission. But as the commission continues to delve deeply into the secret life of Lee Harvey Oswald, she may not necessarily be the most important. For there is evidence that the dominating figure in that life was his mother. This week, at her own request, Marguerite Claverie Pic Oswald Ekdahl, 56, a practical nurse, is scheduled to appear before the commission along with her lawyer, Mark Lane, a New Yorker with an unquenchable passion for the defense of underdogs and liberal causes.”
The article lists Marguerite’s surnames culled from her three marriages—one which had ended in a sudden death ---a veritable sneer in print, then goes on:
There is not much doubt about the mother's purpose: to defend her son's name. She has been doing that ever since the assassination.

Such a campaign is actually rather admirable, but here it is made to sound close to ridiculous.”…doing that” is just what one would expect from a mother who loved her son and believed he was innocent. The term “defend her son’s name” is carefully worded. Later, you will read several truly outrageous statements attributed to Marguerite Oswald. One of the quotes is both gross and shocking. The question you will be asked to consider: was Marguerite Oswald deliberately misquoted by the august Time Magazine? It may be easier for you to decide after reading the rest of this article.

“A short, stout woman with grey hair drawn back in a bun, Marguerite has hardly been hostile to the publicity that has come her way since Nov. 22. "I am an important person," she says with obvious relish. "I understand that I will go down in history too." (emphasis mine)

Imagine the average American reader’s reaction to such a statement. But nobody in 1964 would doubt that this quote was accurate. After all, this is a quote reported by Time Magazine! Keep that in mind as we examine this article.
“…She was at home last week when a reporter went by. "Here," said Mrs. Oswald genially, "have a press release."

The handout related how Mrs. Oswald had sent a wire to President Johnson asking for legal representation for her son at the investigation proceedings.

"You know what I got back?" she asked the reporter. "You know? I got back a note from the White House saying that in the future I ought to direct such messages to the Warren Commission and not the White House at all. Can you imagine? Why, I've got as much right as any citizen to write the President of the United States, to petition him, and let me tell you this, Mr. Johnson should also remember that I am not just anyone, and that he is only President of the United States by the grace of my son's action."

How outrageous! How disgusting! Could the same woman who was telling people her son was innocent actually saying this? The woman was a walking oxymoron. Surely this was an accurate quotation. Right? The two outrageous quotes attributed to Marguerite Oswald are frequently found in researchers’ materials. After all, the information is coming from Time Magazine. So we “must” believe it. Other quotations reported as dropped from the lips of the accused assassin’s mother include:

"Everybody has sympathy for Mrs. Kennedy. Doesn't anybody feel sorry for me? I've had enough misery. I've been married three times and altogether had husbands for a total of eight years. I did my best for my boys."

The same article, on p. 4 of the online version, described Lee Oswald in this manner:
“At one point during an examination, young Lee was asked what he would feel if he plunged a knife into a person. His reply: "Nothing."”


But the written reports on Lee H. Oswald at Youth House, however, obtained by the Warren Commission, mention nothing of the sort, nor do we find any such wording in the testimonies of either the psychiatrist (Hartogs) or of the social worker (Carro).
Since the article was written early in 1964, we do not have to look through reams of prior material. The only “examinations” “young Lee” had that are on record show no mention of the youth being asked such a heinous question. It makes us wonder what else might have been misreported by Time Magazine.

The quotations supposedly made by Marguerite Oswald seem damning, indeed.

Furthermore, there is no doubt that Marguerite neglected young Lee. Both Hartogs and Carro agreed that Marguerite did not provide adequate emotional support or even adequate presence: her typical work day saw her leaving at 7:00 am and returning home at 7:30 pm in New York. Lee told me he often went hungry and sometimes fixed himself “tomato soup” made of catsup and hot water.

Was Marguerite Oswald as outrageously crude in her statements as the Time article represents her? There are several other interviews by mainstream media presenting her in the same light.

But Marguerite Oswald comes out looking more rational and circumspect in an article written by Harold Feldman for the Sept., 1964 issue of The Realist. This non-mainstream media contribution was brought to my attention by researcher Linda Minor. Its title: “The Unsinkable Marguerite Oswald.” Huh? An article praising the looney mom of Lee Harvey Oswald? Granting that Oswald’s mother harbors “extravagant suspicions and speculations” as well as exhibiting “a touch of the prima donna,” nevertheless, the piece is a refreshing expose on Marguerite, compared to mainstream media. Check out these quotations, and compare them to what we found in the Time article:
“One thing is sure…she is a brave, bold, and good woman.” (p. 12)
“I …was led by newspaper accounts to expect a gruff paranoid harridan. What I heard instead…not a second of hesitation in the warm courtesy hat carried within it only a faint suggestion of loneliness.” (p. 12)
“Our tour came several days after the newspapers reported how Oswald was prevented from starting a homicidal career with Richard Nixon only by his wife locking him in his room [the bathroom]. We went to the rooming house…where Lee and marina lived at the time. Marguerite was admitted with sympathetic deference and she went form (sic) room to room, pointing out that none of the doors had ever had locks on them.”
It seems that Marguerite Oswald was doing some investigations of her own. As for direct quotes from Marguerite:

(on the subject of nobody willing to employ the mother of the accused assassin): “The money is running out,” she says, “but I’ve learned not to worry.” (P. 13)
“First they took the President’s body out of Texas. The Dallas doctors thought the bullets came from the front, but the federal men had a secret autopsy in Bethesda, Maryland, when it should have been done here and become part of the court record. Then they took the president’s limousine out of the state, rushed it off. This was a most important item of evidence, but they dismantled it and rebuilt it before anyone here could examine it for bullet holes.” (p. 14)

Feldman told us what the mainstream media somehow missed, about how 13-year-old Lee Oswald felt about being placed in Youth House in New York City for playing hooky:
“…placed in a reformatory for being absent…from school for 17 days, he cried out, “You’ve got to get me out of here, mother. They have real criminals here, kids who have stabbed people and killed people with guns!” (p. 14)

That jives with what Lee Oswald told me about his stay there: he said he had been “brutalized” and that his mother, desperate to make certain he would not be returned there, fled with her son to New Orleans when the judge warned Marguerite that Lee was likely to be placed back at Youth House if she couldn’t supervise him better.

What do we have here? A rational, intelligent-sounding Marguerite Oswald? Is it possible? Feldman, noting that Marguerite used the word “nigger” as did others at that time in the South, seems to be presenting a more balanced and accurate picture of the accused assassin’s mother. There is nothing like it in mainstream media. Summarizing his report on Marguerite, and her intelligent efforts to prove that her son was not only innocent, but was a government agent, Feldman wrote,

“Is Marguerite Oswald “emotional” and “unstable” as the…press says?
We spent 5 days in her house and watched her under high pressure.
If she is emotional, then Molly Pitcher was a hysteric. If she is unstable,
then Mount Rushmore is putty.” (p. 14)

The Time article, then, may have presented a slanted picture of Marguerite Oswald.

So how did Oswald himself fare in Time’s tender hands?

The Valentine’s Day article we have been inspecting reports on p. 6 that Lee Oswald told his wife, Marina, that he had killed General Walker:

“On the night of April 10, Lee Oswald rushed home, exultantly told Marina that he had just killed ex-Army Major General Edwin A. Walker, the right-wing extremist who lives in Dallas.”

Imagine what a reaction Time Magazine readers had to such a directly damning statement: Oswald “exultantly told Marina” that he “had just killed” the right-wing populist, General Walker.

But on Feb, 3, 1964, which was the same time frame within which this article was written, Marina testified before the Warren Commission’s J. Lee Rankin, General Counsel, in the presence of Earl Warren and other eminences of the Warren Commission, that
“When he fired, he did not know whether he had hit Walker or not. He didn't take the bus from there. He ran several kilometers and then took the bus. And he turned on the radio and listened, but there were no reports.”


Marina also told the Warren Commission that her husband buried the rifle that night before coming home. Marina had originally stated to the FBI that she did not know if Oswald owned a rifle.

We understand her position: a Russian citizen whose dead husband was accused of killing the President of the United States, with a toddler and a six-week-old baby, Marina had been “whisked off” as the Time article itself describes the event, into isolation.
The Time article mentioned that Marguerite had bitterly complained about Marina having been spirited away and kept from contact from other family members. Poor Marina! Three months after denying that her husband even owned a rifle, she now described it as having been buried by her husband after he reported shooting at General Walker.
Once again, Time Magazine injects another reason to hate Lee Oswald –supposedly exulting over a killing. How much, then, should we trust the quotations they attribute to Marguerite, which have been repeated ad nauseum ever since to display what an ugly, demented personality she had?

Ruth Paine, in contrast, is presented as a fine, truthful, self-denying lady. On p. 7, Time Magazine quotes Paine, in whose home in Irving (near Dallas) Marina was living in the weeks before the assassination. Oswald lived weekdays in an Oak Cliff boarding house:, “"Usually," recalls Ruth Paine, "he would hitchhike out [to visit on weekends].”

So Oswald was a hitch-hiker! Up comes a picture in middle-class 1963 heads of tramps, bums and hobos. But Oswald is on record as getting almost all his rides with a neighbor near his own age -- Wesley Buell Frazier – when needing a ride to the Paine home. Why is Oswald being depicted as a hitch-hiker, then, by Paine? Or is she being misquoted?
The Time Magazine article is beginning to look like a careful construction to make Oswald look as bad as possible. The public had already been fed plenty of potent misquotations. These would not be noticed by a public hungry for every tidbit that could. tell them more about the mysterious “assassin.” But we are obliged to notice them now.

On page 7, Frazier is mentioned, along with a package of curtain rods that Frazier reported Lee Oswald placed in the back seat of his car. The package was stubbornly described by both Frazier and his sister as too short to be hiding a rifle despite persistent efforts by the Warren Commission to get them to change their story. That’s not what Time Magazine suggests:

“Next morning Lee was up and gone before anyone else in the household was awake. He caught a ride to Dallas with a coworker, Wesley Frazier. He carried a long object wrapped in brown paper. "Curtain rods," he explained. (p. 8) But the rifle was gone from the Paine garage. At 12:30 that afternoon, just as President Kennedy's car passed by the Texas Book Depository, that same rifle was poked out of a sixth-floor window.” (bold face mine)

Gone, too, is all mention of the Mauser rifle that for almost two days was described as the murder weapon before it was replaced in official reports with a Mannlicher Carcano traceable to Oswald, through what we now know are impossible means.

Among many other problems, the mail order involved with the weapon left Dallas by ordinary mail mikes from Oswald’s place of work, with the money order for the rifle purchased at yet another site miles from Oswald’s work – and he had only half an hour for lunch, with no known transportation from his workplace. Yet the order reached

Chicago the very next day and was processed that same day as well. Further, that same day, the rifle was supposedly mailed to Oswald’s post office box to his alias, Hidell. Trouble is, post office records indicated that nobody named “Hidell” was on Oswald’s list of persons who could receive mail at that post office box (see George Bailey’ blog for his research on the mail order slip).

Nevertheless, the article assumes that the weapon, described on Oswald-did-it sites as the same kind of rifle used by Italian infantry (not true: this was a different and inferior model) goes on to say that Oswald “slipped out of the rear entrance of the building” when witnesses tell us he walked out the front door and even stopped to talk to people there before leaving work for the day. The killing of Officer J. D.Tippit is mentioned as a casual killing along the way:

“Oswald whipped out a .38-cal. revolver, pumped three bullets into Tippit and killed him. Minutes later, he was cornered in a movie house. “
We have already discussed the problem with the cartridges. The cartridges found at the scene of the crime came from a semi-automatic, not the revolver Oswald was said to have on his person in the theater. Tippit had four bullets removed from his body.
At the police station, though he had been patted down, frisked and inspected, more bullets were ‘found’ on Oswald’s person.

As for any remarks supposedly made by Oswald, remember that they are all provided to us, as were the cartridges, the map, the Magic Bullet, and the Mannlicher-Carcano, compliments of the Dallas Police, the CIA and the FBI. No tape recordings (!) or stenographic notes (!) were taken during the many hours of interrogation Oswald endured.

We have to rely on those fine paragons of the defenders of justice as to what Lee Oswald said while in custody, and also, we must rely on heir reports as to how Oswald was treated. We know he was treated unfairly in line-ups. It’s not an exaggeration to say that Oswald, beaten, unshaven, and wearing torn clothing, stood out like a sore thumb. The line-ups were a travesty because Oswald was required to give his name and workplace—already plastered in the newspapers and over radio and TV—while those standing with him gave fake names and fake workplaces.

The Valentine’s Day massacre of Lee H. Oswald’s character is now being read by the unwary new generation that may trust Time and other mainstream media to be accurate, unbiased reporters of the truth. We would like to think that today Time would reconsider before publishing the outrageous quote attributed to Marguerite Oswald, on p. 2 of the Valentine’s Day article: “"I am an important person," she says with obvious relish. "I understand that I will go down in history too."

Such a statement raises the hackles and engenders feelings of disgust for this woman. But did Marguerite Oswald actually say such a thing? Can we be certain that she did? Can we be certain that mainstream media accurately described Lee Harvey Oswald? I urge you to consider the arrests of “vendors” at Dealey Plaza by the Dallas Police. I urge you to consider that The History Channel banned here important documentaries exonerating Lee H. Oswald – the last three in a series called The Men Who Killed Kennedy –episodes 7-8-9 (“The Smoking Guns,” “The Love Affair” and “The Guilty Men.”). After these documentaries were banned (they can be seen on YouTube, at Edward T. Haslam's websie (doctormarysmonkey.com) and at my website http://www.judythvarybaker.com)-- following outcries and threats of lawsuits from powerful Oswald-did-it forces, the History-Rewritten-Channel has gone on to air only official version anti-Oswald documentaries ever since, along with “specials” aimed at the character assassination of John F. Kennedy and the Kennedy family.

The once-beloved President’s dirty laundry, above all, must be exposed to the public. Is the media out to make sure nobody cares what happened to John F. Kennedy, once heralded as the hero of PT-109?
Then maybe nobody will care who kills our next presidents, or who runs our country. With major media firmly under control, only voices such as mine, from the past, remain to warn you that only the truth will keep the American people free.

Judyth Vary Baker
witness to Oswald’s innocence,
at age 67, forced to live in exile
Consider reading my book, Me & Lee: How I Came to Know, Love and
Lose Lee Harvey Oswald.




REFERENCES AND COMMENTS:

NOTE: SCRIBD HAS THIS DOCUMENT IN ITS ENTIRETY, WITH ALL PHOTOS AND REFERENCES NUMBERED AND TAGGED.

President Kennedy was shot at 12:30 pm and Officer Tippit was reported dead at 1:16 pm. The Warren Commission said Tippit was killed at 1:15 pm. Police description of Oswald’s arrest shows the process –including the fight that ensued— took less than ten minutes.

The Warren Commission’s prime witness, Helen Markham, testified she heard three bullets fired. A fifth bullet, according to an ambulance driver, rolled out of Tippit’s uniform button where it had smashed flat.

None of these three witnesses were called to testify to the Warren Commission. Why?

The explanation was that the .38 involved with Oswald was supposed to have been rechambered to accept those kind of bullets.
See the books Dr. Mary’s Monkey by Edward T. Haslam and Me & Lee: How I Came to Know, Love and Lose Lee Harvey Oswald, by the author of this article, for information on why Oswald had to die before he talked.

6 Pamela Ray, from her interview on Live Talk ERadio regarding her book about James Files, Interview with History: The JFK Assassination
( http://jfkmurderjamesfiles.weebly.com/lee-harvey-oswald.html )
Ref: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FDDuRSgzFk


“When Lee Harvey Oswald was first arrested, Otto Mullinax, on behalf of the ACLU, went to the Dallas jail to see if Oswald wanted assistance, and word came back that Oswald did not want to talk to any ACLU lawyer.” “ACLU in Texas-The Early Years,” The Texas Observer, Mar 7, 2008 by Richards, Dave

KEN RAHN HTTP://WWW.KENRAHN.COM/JFK/THE_CRITICS/LANE/NATL-GUARDIAN/NATL_GUARDIAN.HTML
“The Katzenbach Memo” www.jfklancer.com/Katzenbach.html

See Douglas P. Horne’s discussion of the findings of “The Hollywood Seven” – a group of Hollywood film restoration experts who determined some frames in the Zapruder film had been crudely painted to hide Kennedy’s being shot from the front, and much more, in his book Inside the ARRB.


“The Zapruder Film Comes to Home Video,” Jim DeEugenio, Probe Magazine, Vol. 5, No. 6
http://www.ctka.net/pr998-zfilm.html

”Dan Rather Blinked” by Penn Jones, Jr, The Continuing Inquiry, July 22, 1977 edition. http://www.acorn.net/jfkplace/09/fp.back_issues/05th_Issue/rather.html

See the entire article at: http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=121884

“Jim DiEiugenio, “The Zapruder Film Comes to Home Video,” Probe Magazine, Vo. 5 No. 6, 1990 http://www.ctka.net/pr998-zfilm.html

16 “The Dartmouth-JFK Photo Fiasco” by Dr. James Fetzer and Jim Marrs http://www.opednews.com/articles/THE-DARTMOUTH-JFK-PHOTO-FI-by-Jim-Fetzer-091116-941.html;

Also see my article on the subject: “Is Dartmouth Professor's Analysis of Oswald Backyard Photo Flawless? at “Oswald Framed: Convenient Lies and Cover-Ups”
http://oswald-framed.blogspot.com/2009/11/is-dartmouth-professors-analysis-of.html
17

To see the YouTube film, “Fake,Forged Photograph that Framed Lee Harvey Oswald, go to this URL: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3488132719239248250#

All quotations regarding this article come from “Investigations: Between Two Fires” http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,870730-4,00.html#ixzz0sBc90mA1

“The Unsinkable Marguerite Oswald” The Realist, issue #53, September, 1964,pp. 12-15.
http://www.ep.tc/realist/53/12.html

Read more:: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,870730-6,00.html#ixzz0sBskEeoL

See the following YouTube videos: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=249DTnfrKMo, and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AqqNKsWCGY&feature=PlayList&p=02BABD331C6CAE12&playnext_from=PL&playnext=1&index=5
http://oswaldsmother.blogspot.com/2009/11/who-bought-guns.html

Also, read “Osald and the Sixth Floor MC Can’t Be Linked,” by Miles Scull, for technical and background information on the rifle Oswald supposedly used to kill JFK at : http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php?topic=1925.5;wap2

Interviewed by Captain Fritz 11/22/63, Oswald said "as he was leaving the TSBD buildng, two men (had intercepted him at the front door, identified themselves as Secret Service Agents and asked for the location of a telephone" (CD 354). Oswald then left the TSBD and walked east on Elm.

24 “Did Oswald Shoot Tippit? A Review of Dale Myers' Book With Malice: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Murder of Officer J.D. Tippit, Michael T. Griffith 2002 http://www.kenrahn.com/jfk/the_critics/griffith/With_Malice.html